Skip to main content
. 2023 May 22;9(2):174–197. doi: 10.1007/s40726-023-00261-y

Table 2.

Impacts of different sludge treatment processes on microplastics

Process Impact on MPs References
Lime stabilization

• Smaller size MPs due to elevated temperature, mechanical mixing, and pH

• Shredded and flaked appearance

[90••]
AD

• Less MPs abundance in AD sludge when compared with lime stabilized sludge

• Presence of deep cleavage in MPs

• Alteration in micro-morphology of MPs

[27, 28, 90••]
Dewatering

• More than 50% reduction in MPs numbers after dewatering might be due to probable destruction of flocs in the digestive process that returned to WWTP with rejected water

• Different average MPs concentrations (belt-type group > filter pressure > centrifuged group > plate-frame group)

[62, 73]
Pretreatment

• Pretreatment can influence the size, surface morphology, and adsorption potential

• NaOH > high concentration of acids > low concentration of acids > H2O2 and Fenton

[91]
Thermal drying

• More melding, wrinkling, and fracturing in MPs in thermal dried sludge

• Cracking in MPs after thermal heating and drying

[28, 90••]
Thermal hydrolysis • An increase in MPs number [28]