Table 2.
Impacts of different sludge treatment processes on microplastics
| Process | Impact on MPs | References |
|---|---|---|
| Lime stabilization |
• Smaller size MPs due to elevated temperature, mechanical mixing, and pH • Shredded and flaked appearance |
[90••] |
| AD |
• Less MPs abundance in AD sludge when compared with lime stabilized sludge • Presence of deep cleavage in MPs • Alteration in micro-morphology of MPs |
[27, 28, 90••] |
| Dewatering |
• More than 50% reduction in MPs numbers after dewatering might be due to probable destruction of flocs in the digestive process that returned to WWTP with rejected water • Different average MPs concentrations (belt-type group > filter pressure > centrifuged group > plate-frame group) |
[62, 73] |
| Pretreatment |
• Pretreatment can influence the size, surface morphology, and adsorption potential • NaOH > high concentration of acids > low concentration of acids > H2O2 and Fenton |
[91] |
| Thermal drying |
• More melding, wrinkling, and fracturing in MPs in thermal dried sludge • Cracking in MPs after thermal heating and drying |
[28, 90••] |
| Thermal hydrolysis | • An increase in MPs number | [28] |