Table 2.

Algorithm performance.

Algorithm	AVG Perf	BEST Perf
	Mean ± SD	Mean ± SD
A1	8.48 ± 8.00	6.82 ± 6.40
A2	8.04 ± 6.82	9.92 ± 6.22
A3	8.59 ± 6.41	9.96 ± 5.95
A4	17.13 ± 5.03	18.22 ± 6.70
A5	23.25 ± 5.25	20.55 ± 6.71
A6	7.90 ± 6.79	9.09 ± 5.88
A7	7.91 ± 6.62	8.99 ± 5.89
A8	8.50 ± 8.17	6.80 ± 6.31
A9	8.48 ± 8.07	7.09 ± 6.65
A10	8.38 ± 6.15	10.16 ± 5.89
A11	12.47 ± 4.27	15.16 ± 6.28
A12	12.50 ± 4.19	14.61 ± 6.20
A13	12.29 ± 4.31	15.12 ± 6.35
A14	18.40 ± 5.46	18.33 ± 6.83
A15	18.17 ± 5.45	17.92 ± 6.87
A16	18.56 ± 5.52	18.26 ± 6.70
A17	17.20 ± 4.98	18.12 ± 6.63
A18	17.27 ± 5.08	18.37 ± 6.56
A19	23.16 ± 5.29	20.77 ± 6.65
A20	22.94 ± 5.35	20.80 ± 6.73
A21	8.45 ± 6.24	10.05 ± 6.18
A22	18.63 ± 5.35	19.28 ± 6.51
A23	18.91 ± 5.17	19.12 ± 6.64
A24	18.49 ± 5.29	18.98 ± 6.73
A25	24.04 ± 5.33	21.14 ± 6.71
A26	24.12 ± 5.16	21.00 ± 6.78
A27	24.05 ± 5.44	20.98 ± 6.80
A28	12.66 ± 6.05	13.29 ± 6.77
ALORS	6.00 ± 5.14	6.75 ± 5.90

The ranking of the protein–igand docking algorithms with ALORS, utilizing all those standalone algorithms as a high-level approach. (The results in bold refer to the overall best ones).