Table 3.

Association of lifestyle factors on fatty liver index in binary logistic regression analysis

FLI ≥ 60	Male				Female
	Model 1		Model 2		Model 1		Model 2
	Odds ratio	P value	Odds ratio (95% CI)	P value	Odds ratio (95% CI)	P value	Odds ratio (95% CI)	P value
Socio-economic status
Weak	Ref.		Ref.		Ref.		Ref.
Moderate	1.21(0.99–1.49)	0.057	1.18(0.96–1.45)	0.110	1.38(1.17–1.62)	< 0.001	1.28(1.08–1.53)	0.004
Good	1.72(1.42–2.08)	< 0.001	1.63(1.33-2.00)	< 0.001	1.25(1.04–1.51)	0.015	1.17(0.95–1.45)	0.133
Physical activity (Met h/day)
Low	Ref.		Ref.		Ref.		Ref.
Moderate	0.74(0.63–0.88)	0.001	0.76(0.64–0.89)	0.001	0.81(0.69–0.96)	0.016	0.77(0.65–0.91)	0.003
High	0.43(0.37–0.51)	< 0.001	0.44(0.37–0.53)	< 0.001	0.53(0.41–0.70)	< 0.001	0.54(0.41–0.71)	< 0.001
Visceral Fat Area	1.05(1.05–1.18)	< 0.001	1.05(1.01–1.45)	< 0.001	1.05 (1.04–1.05)	< 0.001	1.05(1.04–1.05)	< 0.001
Energy intake (kcal/d)	1.00(1.00-1.23)	0.001	1.00(1.00-1.19)	0.019	1.00 (1.00-1.51)	0.045	1.00(1.00-1.09)	0.009
Depression	0.89(0.49–1.62)	0.711	0.93(0.51–1.70)	0.822	1.68(1.06–2.64)	0.025	1.71(1.07–2.71)	0.022
Dyslipidemia	4.13(3.57–4.80)	< 0.001	4.09(3.52–4.75)	< 0.001	2.81(2.41–3.27)	0.002	2.69(2.31–3.14)	0.003

Model 1: Unadjusted model

Model 2: adjusted for age, marital status, residency and alcohol use

*Obtained by binary logistic regression, P value < 0.05