Skip to main content
. 2023 May 22:1–20. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1057/s41264-023-00234-8

Table 10.

Robustness checks using the Sobel Goodman mediation test

Variables Model (1) Model (2) Model (3) Model (4)
Financial behaviour 0.996*** 0.849*** 1.210*** 1.045***
(0.0996) (0.102) (0.0907) (0.106)
[0.80,1.19] [0.64,1.05] [1.03,1.38] [0.83,1.25]
Financial literacy 0.443***
(0.0799)
[0.28,0.59]
Financial socialisation 0.675***
(0.0929)
[0.49,0.85]
Self-control 0.222***
(0.0722)
[0.08,0.36]
Financial technology 0.286***
(0.0729)
[0.14,0.42]
Constant 6.935*** 6.325*** 7.226*** 7.683***
(1.017) (0.990) (1.142) (1.024)
Observations 360 360 360 360
R-squared 0.417 0.448 0.383 0.393
a coefficient

0.412***

(0.036)

0.529***

(0.039)

0.199***

(0.041)

0.391***

(0.030)

b coefficient

0.996***

(0.100)

0.849***

(0.102)

1.210***

(0.091)

1.045***

(0.106)

a × b

0.411***

(0.055)

0.449***

(0.063)

0.241***

(0.053)

0.408****

(0.052)

c′ coefficient

0.443***

(0.080)

0.675***

(0.093)

0.222***

(0.072)

0.286***

(0.073)

Sobel-Goodman mediation test

0.411***

(0.055)

0.449***

(0.063)

0.241***

(0.053)

0.408***

(0.052)

Proportion of total effect that is mediated 48.1% 39.9% 52.0% 58.8%

Standard errors in parentheses (). 95% confident interval in brackets []

*, ** and *** denote significant at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively

Dependent variable: Financial well-being