Skip to main content
. 2023 May 22:1–39. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1007/s11069-023-05970-7

Table 1.

Literature summary regarding seismic risk assessment

Sources Structural damage Shelter/temporary housing Debris Casualties Hospital/healthcare functionality Economical impact (direct/indirect) Social impact Stage Hazard/disaster type
Félix et al. (2020) Preparedness EQ*
Abeling and Ingham (2020), Lazar Sinković and Dolšek (2020) and Zhang et al. (2022) Preparedness EQ
Stumpf et al. (2019) and Pianigiani and Viti (2021) Preparedness EQ
Zhai et al. (2021) Mitigation EQ
Park and Cox (2019) Mitigation EQ, TSU*
Dabbeek et al. (2020) Mitigation EQ, FL*
Wei et al. (2022) Mitigation EQ
Halder et al. (2020),Liu et al. (2020), Hancilar et al. (2020), Surana et al. (2020), Chandra Dutta et al. (2021) and da Silva et al. (2021) Mitigation EQ
Izquierdo-Horna and Kahhat (2020) Mitigation EQ
Liet al. (2021b) and Chen and Zhang (2022) Mitigation EQ
Ishibashi et al. (2021) Mitigation EQ
Zhang et al. (2020) Response EQ
Yazdanpanah et al. (2021) Response EQ
Santarelli et al. (2018) Response EQ
Koyama et al. (2016) Response TSU
Oksuz and Satoglu (2020) Response EQ
Zhao et al. (2021) Response EQ
Hassan and Mahmoud (2020) and Hassan and Mahmoud (2019) Recovery EQ
Achour and Miyajima (2020) Recovery EQ
Fang et al. (2021) Recovery EQ
Khanal et al. (2021) Recovery EQ
This Study Preparedness EQ

*EQ earthquake, TSU tsunami, FL flood