Skip to main content
. 2023 May 22;2023(5):CD002283. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002283.pub5

Comparison 5. Upper retainer versus no retention after treatment of maxillary impacted canines .

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
5.1 Stability: upper irregularity index 1 63 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.90 [‐1.33, ‐0.47]
5.2 Stability: upper intercanine width 1 63 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.30 [‐0.73, 0.13]
5.3 Stability: upper intermolar width 1 63 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.10 [‐0.53, 0.33]
5.4 Stability: upper arch length 1 63 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.30 [0.03, 0.57]
5.5 Stability: upper maximum rotation 1 63 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐1.70 [‐3.20, ‐0.20]