Skip to main content
. 2023 May 22;2023(5):CD002283. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002283.pub5

NCT02742493.

Study name Effectiveness of 3 orthodontic retention schemes on post‐treatment stability and gingival recession
Methods Study design: single‐centre, open‐label, 3‐armed, parallel, randomised, active‐control trial
Country: Greece
Duration of follow‐up: 1 year in retention, 2 years and 5 years
Inclusion criteria 
  • Both sexes

  • Age between 10 and 16 years

  • At the finishing stage of orthodontic treatment, programmed for debonding

  • Class I to Class II molar relationship before the beginning of orthodontic treatment

  • Non‐extraction treatment plan with fixed straight‐wire appliances

  • Space deficiencies and irregularity of no more than 6 mm in the maxillary/mandibular arch (Irregularity Index)


Exclusion criteria 
  • No missing teeth, impacted teeth or other dental anomalies

  • No congenital anomalies/syndromes

Participants The study aims to enrol and randomise 60 participants. 
Interventions
  • Group 1 (experimental intervention): lower fixed canine and canine retainer (0.028 inch stainless steel bonded to canines) and upper removable Hawley

  • Group 2 (experimental intervention): lower fixed canine to canine retainer (7‐strand Twistflex 0.027 inch bonded to all 6 anterior teeth) and upper removable Hawley

  • Group 3 (active comparator): lower Hawley‐type and upper Hawley removable retainer

Outcomes Primary outcomes
  • Stability ‐ LII, intercanine width, interpremolar width, intermolar width, arch length, overbite and overjet


Secondary outcomes
  • Survival rate ‐ bond failures of fixed retainers or breakages of removable ones

  • Adverse effects ‐ gingival recessions

Starting date 19 April 2016
Contact information Principal Investigator: Dr Despina Koletsi
Institution: Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Athens, Greece
Email: d.koletsi@gmail.com
Notes Contacted study author, study ongoing