Skip to main content
. 2023 May 22;2023(5):CD004128. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004128.pub5

Mori 2000.

Study characteristics
Methods Study type: RCT
Aim of the study: efficacy
Participating sites: 1 university hospital in Sapporo, Japan
Language: English
Participants Number randomised: 36 (intervention); 18 (control)
Inclusion criteria: people successfully resuscitated from out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest with GCS < 8
Mean age: n.i.
Women (%): n.i.
Cardiac arrest location: out‐of‐hospital
Cause of cardiac arrest: n.i.
Primary cardiac rhythm: n.i.
Witnessed cardiac arrest: n.i.
Bystander CPR: n.i.
Timing (minutes): n.i.
Temperature on admission/at start of cooling: n.i.
Subgroups reported: none
Interventions Prehospital cooling: no
Target temperature: 32–34 °C
Duration (hours) of cooling: 72 hours
Was intervention initiated within 2 hours of ROSC? n.i.
Was target temperature reached within 4 hours of ROSC? n.i.
Co‐interventions? n.i.
Was rewarming controlled? n.i.
Rewarming rate (per protocol): n.i.
Description of intervention: water‐circulating blankets above and below participant with another ice‐mounted blanket over participant
Cooling rate: n.i.
Timing of intervention: n.i.
Outcomes GCS at 1 month (5‐point scale). Categories "moderate, mild, or no disabilities" defined as "good neurological outcome."
Control group treatment Brain normothermic therapy at 36 °C
Funding source  
Notes Abstract
Study included in the pooled analysis, as we received information from the authors on the cooling method