Table 5.
Exploratory Secondary Outcomes:
Changes from baseline at F4 |
Mean differences from baseline to 4-weeks: Baseline adjusted* [absolute (SD)] |
Adjusted mean difference of differences or Odds ratio (Buspirone -Placebo) (95% CI)†§ |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Buspirone | Placebo | P | ||
No. evaluable patients‡ | 40 | 39 | ||
Gastroparesis symptoms inventories | ||||
PAGI-SYM Severity index symptom severities (0=none to 5=very severe) |
||||
Retching severity | −0.46 (1.93) | −0.70 (1.51) | 0.16 (−0.49, 0.81) | 0.64 |
Stomach distension severity | −1.38 (1.58) | −1.20 (1.58) | −0.18 (−0.83, 0.47) | 0.59 |
Upper abdominal discomfort | −0.87 (1.50) | −1.00 (1.61) | 0.12 (−0.49, 0.73) | 0.69 |
Lower abdominal pain severity | −0.31 (1.93) | −0.66 (1.39) | 0.35 (−0.26, 0.96) | 0.26 |
Lower abdominal discomfort | −0.48 (1.89) | −0.77 (1.51) | 0.29 (−0.36, 0.94) | 0.38 |
Constipation severity | −0.22 (1.61) | −0.57 (1.58) | 0.35 (−0.27, 0.97) | 0.27 |
Diarrhea severity | −0.54 (1.77) | −0.51 (1.64) | −0.03 (−0.71, 0.64) | 0.91 |
Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) subscores (0=no to 7=very severe discomfort) |
||||
Reflux score | −0.72 (1.50) | −0.67 (1.56) | −0.04 (−0.64, 0.56) | 0.89 |
Abdominal pain score | −0.97 (1.40) | −0.54 (1.55) | −0.42 (−0.98, 0.13) | 0.14 |
Indigestion score | −0.67 (1.40) | −0.48 (1.13) | −0.19 (−0.70, 0.32) | 0.46 |
Diarrhea score | −0.57 (1.98) | −0.35 (1.35) | −0.21 (−0.83, 0.40) | 0.50 |
Constipation score | −0.23 (1.61) | −0.53 (1.82) | 0.29 (−0.34, 0.93) | 0.37 |
ANMS Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index Daily Diary (GCSI-DD) (all items scored 0 to 4, none to very severe) | ||||
GCSI total score | −0.73 (0.94) | −0.28 (0.56) | −0.45 (−0.79, −0.12) | 0.007 |
Nausea severity | −0.65 (0.98) | −0.18 (0.76) | −0.48 (−0.86, −0.09) | 0.01 |
Bloating severity | −0.82 (0.97) | −0.27 (0.87) | −0.55 (−0.93, −0.17) | 0.004 |
Upper abdominal pain | −0.79 (0.93) | −0.34 (1.06) | −0.45 (−0.87, −0.04) | 0.03 |
Vomiting (No. of episodes) | −0.001 (1.33) | 0.37 (2.16) | −0.37 (−1.18, 0.43) | 0.36 |
Overall symptom severity | −0.58 (1.00) | −0.26 (0.66) | −0.32 (−0.68, 0.04) | 0.08 |
Physiologic test: | ||||
Electrogastrogram (EGG) results‖ | ||||
Average power in frequency region, % | ||||
Bradygastria (1-<2.5 cpm) | ||||
Baseline | 2.63 (25.78) | −2.52 (17.71) | 5.15 (−3.89, 14.19) | 0.26 |
0–30 post-satiety | 3.98 (15.80) | 0.36 (17.97) | 3.62 (−3.00, 10.25) | 0.28 |
Normogastria (2.5-<3.8 cpm) | ||||
Baseline | −0.23 (11.73) | −1.13 (12.03) | 0.90 (−4.38, 6.189) | 0.74 |
0–30 post-satiety | −1.71 (10.19) | −1.87 (7.24) | −0.52 (−4.20, 3.17) | 0.78 |
Tachygastria (3.8–10 cpm) | ||||
Baseline | 0.10 (16.76) | 1.72 (11.06) | −1.62 (−6.16, 2.93) | 0.49 |
0–30 post-satiety | 0.92 (8.96) | −0.59 (11.87) | 1.15 (−3.07, 6.10) | 0.52 |
Duodenal (>10–15 cpm) | ||||
Baseline | −1.92 (15.51) | 1.75 (10.87) | −3.66 (−9.58, 2.25) | 0.22 |
0–30 post-satiety | −0.76 (8.26) | 0.44 (11.92) | −1.20 (−4.47, 2.07) | 0.47 |
Mean differences adjusted for the baseline value of the outcome and treatment group indicator are the Least Squares means (LS-means) (i.e., the predicted population margins) computed using a generalized linear ANCOVA model of the primary outcome on treatment group and baseline value.
Adjusted mean difference of differences (DoD) from baseline were computed using ANCOVA, regressing change from baseline to 4-weeks on treatment group and baseline value of the outcome. Wald 95% Confidence Limits (CI) are reported; P (2-sided) determined from a Wald Chi-Square test.
Number of evaluable patients (complete-case analysis) will vary with each outcome depending on the questionnaire or procedure. No. patients with 4-week satiety and EGG data: 26 Buspirone, 26 placebo. For DD analysis: 76 total patients (41 P, 35 B).
Odds ratio, 95% confidence intervals and P from an exact logistic regression of outcome on treatment group adjusted for the baseline value. For the 29 outcomes, the Bonferroni level of significance would be P≤0.0017; no P-values were significant by Bonferroni-Hochberg corrected significance levels either.
Electrogastrogram (EGG) results for average percent power have been validated by central review.