Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 27;72(6):735–745. doi: 10.2337/db22-1034

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics for youth who converted to T2D over study period (case patients) compared with control participants and total study cohort

Case patients (n = 6) Control participants (n = 30) Total cohort (n = 262) P *
Sex
 Male 4 (67) 16 (53) 162 (59) 0.7
 Female 2 (33) 14 (47) 113 (41) 0.3
Age, years 11.3 ± 2 11.2 ± 2 11.5 ± 2 0.9
Weight, kg 68.5 ± 26 65.8 ± 20 66.1 ± 20 0.7
Height, cm 152.5 ± 17 150.3 ± 13 151.1 ± 12 0.6
BMI, kg/m2 28.3 ± 6 28.5 ± 5 28.3 ± 6 0.7
BMI percentile 96.9 ± 4 97.5 ± 3 96.5 ± 5 0.6
 <85th (normal) 0 (0) 0 (0) 9 (3)
 ≥85th and ≤95th percentile (overweight) 1 (17) 4 (13) 97 (35)
 ≥95th and 120% of 95th percentile (class I obesity) 3 (50) 15 (50) 133 (48)
 >120% of 95th percentile (class II or III) 2 (33) 11 (37) 80 (30)
Tanner stage 0.1
 1 3 (50) 7 (23) 89 (32)
 2 0 (0) 8 (27) 90 (33)
 3 0 (0) 4 (13) 36 (13)
 4 6 (20) 40 (15)
 5 3 (50) 5 (17) 20 (7)
Birth weight, kg 4.0 ± 1.1 3.7 ± 0.8 3.7 ± 1.1 0.7
Household education level 0.2
 Lower than high school 3 (50) 17 (57) 187 (68)
 Completed high school 0 (0) 12 (40) 74 (27)
 Higher than high school 3 (50) 1 (3) 14 (5)

Data are presented as n (%) or mean ± SD. Control participants were selected with propensity score–matching sex, BMI, and pubertal status at ratio of five control participants per case patient.

*

Statistical comparison between group differences for case patients versus control participants.

Two-sample t test.

Fisher exact test.