Table 7.
Gap analysis for current levels of frost resistant crop production in New Zealand, relative to dietary energy requirements for the whole New Zealand population in various scenarios*
| Base case and nutrition scenarios | Nuclear war but otherwise business-as-usual agricultural productivity (Scenario NW0) |
8% reduction in agricultural productivity from nuclear winter (Scenario NW1) |
28% reduction in agricultural productivity from nuclear winter (Scenario NW2) |
61% reduction in agricultural productivity from nuclear winter (Scenario NW3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base case: Meeting dietary energy requirements for the whole New Zealand population (current levels) from frost resistant crops | 74.4% | 68.5% | 53.7% | 29.3% |
| Scenario A: As per the base case above but using plausibly acceptable lower levels of dietary energy (10% less) | 82.7% | 76.1% | 59.7% | 32.5% |
| Scenario B: As per the base case but assuming only 50% of both dietary energy and protein intakes from frost resistant crops (assuming the rest of the food is obtained additional sources of frost sensitive crops and grass-fed livestock products – see Methods) | 149% (oversupply) | 137% (oversupply) | 107% (oversupply) | 58.5% |
*Based on the crops and yield data in Table 5, for all frost resistant crops together, except those with missing production data for New Zealand: sugar beet, rye, and swede. Given that sugar beet (or the similar fodder beet) production is probably non-trivial in New Zealand, the results in this table are probably underestimates.