Skip to main content
. 2023 May 22;13:8254. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35354-7

Table 7.

Gap analysis for current levels of frost resistant crop production in New Zealand, relative to dietary energy requirements for the whole New Zealand population in various scenarios*

Base case and nutrition scenarios Nuclear war but otherwise business-as-usual agricultural productivity
(Scenario NW0)
8%
reduction in agricultural productivity from nuclear winter
(Scenario NW1)
28%
reduction in agricultural productivity from nuclear winter
(Scenario NW2)
61%
reduction in agricultural productivity from nuclear winter
(Scenario NW3)
Base case: Meeting dietary energy requirements for the whole New Zealand population (current levels) from frost resistant crops 74.4% 68.5% 53.7% 29.3%
Scenario A: As per the base case above but using plausibly acceptable lower levels of dietary energy (10% less) 82.7% 76.1% 59.7% 32.5%
Scenario B: As per the base case but assuming only 50% of both dietary energy and protein intakes from frost resistant crops (assuming the rest of the food is obtained additional sources of frost sensitive crops and grass-fed livestock products – see Methods) 149% (oversupply) 137% (oversupply) 107% (oversupply) 58.5%

*Based on the crops and yield data in Table 5, for all frost resistant crops together, except those with missing production data for New Zealand: sugar beet, rye, and swede. Given that sugar beet (or the similar fodder beet) production is probably non-trivial in New Zealand, the results in this table are probably underestimates.