Skip to main content
. 2023 May 9;14:1164943. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1164943

TABLE 4.

Results of the linear models in which each risk score was used as the outcome (dependent variable) and categorization of the fitness status as the predictor, adjusting for covariates. Estimates can be interpreted as the increase in the percentage risk score for individual in the NORMAL and UNFIT categories compared to the FIT (reference) group.

Fitness status based on the 6 min walking test Fitness status based on the fitAA measure
Estimate 95% CI p Estimate 95% CI p
Framingham CVD score
Normal 0.91 (−2.45; 4.28) 0.60 0.83 (−3.05; 4.71) 0.68
Unfit −0.83 (−4.23; 2.57) 0.63 4.15 (−0.74; 9.04) 0.10
ACC AHA CVD score
Normal 0.28 (−3.40; 3.95) 0.88 0.90 (−1.78; 3.57) 0.51
Unfit −1.77 (−5.48; 1.94) 0.35 4.51 (1.13; 7.89) 0.01
MESA CVD score
Normal 0.77 (−0.76; 2.30) 0.33 0.24 (−0.82; 1.31) 0.66
Unfit 0.42 (−1.13; 1.97) 0.60 1.40 (0.05;2.74) 0.04
Stern diabetes risk score
Normal −6.33 (−15.39; 2.72) 0.17 −1.99 (−8.87; 4.88) 0.57
Unfit −6.52 (−15.68; 2.64) 0.17 −2.07 (−10.87; 6.72) 0.64
Comorbidity index
Normal 0.13 (−0.48; 0.74) 0.67 0.16 (−0.36; 0.68) 0.55
Unfit 0.15 (−0.46; 0.77) 0.63 0.06 (−0.60; 0.71) 0.87
Levine Mortality score
Normal −0.34 (−4.82; 4.14) 0.88 0.27 (−3.50; 4.05) 0.89
Unfit 1.49 (−3.02; 6.01) 0.52 4.80 (0.01; 9.60) 0.04

Abbreviations: fitAA, fitness age acceleration; CVD, cardiovascular diseases; ACC, American College of Cardiology; AHA, American heart association; MESA, multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Only significant p values should be in bold.