TABLE 3.
Ablation studies with different network configurations.
Index | Baseline | CD | AS | ISAM | PIBL | SE (%) | SP (%) | ACC (%) | F1 (%) | AUC (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | √ | 78.95 | 98.75 | 97.01 | 82.27 | 98.72 | ||||
2 | √ | √ | 78.36 | 98.78 | 96.99 | 82.00 | 98.66 | |||
3 | √ | √ | √ | 79.67 | 98.73 | 97.06 | 82.60 | 98.80 | ||
4 | √ | √ | √ | √ | 80.11 | 98.70 | 97.07 | 82.73 | 98.80 | |
5 | √ | √ | √ | √ | 81.79 | 98.48 | 97.02 | 82.76 | 98.80 | |
6 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | 82.51 | 98.44 | 97.04 | 83.01 | 98.81 |
Baseline: Res-UNet; CD, Cascade Design; AS, Auxiliary Supervision; ISAM, Inter-Stage Attention Module; and PIBL, Pixel-Importance-Balance Loss. The value in bold is the highest value under that metric.