Skip to main content
. 2023 May 8;25:e37540. doi: 10.2196/37540

Table 2.

Random forest (RF) performance comparison: predicting norovirus laboratory reports in specific age groups and regions—existing and emerging syndromic variables were lagged by 1 or 2 weeks.

Predicting laboratory reports for each group and region RF (lag=1) RF (lag=2)

Explained % RMSEa (bootstrap) Explained % RMSE (bootstrap)
Age group (years)

0-4 48.8 8 43 8.2

5-14 b

15-24 13.14 2.2 6 2.3

25-44 25.18 4 20 4.3

45-64 32.16 6.6 33 6.5

≥65 55.69 40.5 60 36.6
Region

North East 7.50 6.6 19.91 6.2

North West 30.39 7.2 34.06 6.5

Yorkshire and Humber 29.79 11.3 26.41 10.9

East Midlands 39.42 6.9 42.19 7.1

West Midlands 35.11 9.73 32.44 9.6

East of England 44.46 12 42 11.6

London 47.1 8.7 35.45 8.5

South East 18.1 8.8 12.6 8.3

South West 35 15.7 38.57 15.1

aRMSE: root-mean-square error.

bNot available.