Skip to main content
. 2023 May 23;4(1):e248. doi: 10.1002/deo2.248

TABLE 2.

Comparison of baseline characteristics between endoscopic ultrasound guided‐gastrojejunostomy and robotic gastrojejunostomy cohorts

Characteristic EUS‐GJ (n = 29) R‐GJ (n = 15) p‐Value
Mean age (SD), years 66.3 (12.6) 64.1 (13.7) 0.73
Female gender, n (%) 10 (34) 7 (47) 0.52
Pre‐operative BMI, mean (SD), kg/m2 22.3 (4.0) 27.2 (5.7) 0.007*
Pre‐operative PNI, mean (SD) 35.8 (6.5) 39.2 (6.5) 0.11
Charlson comorbidity index, mean (SD) 10.3 (1.8) 7.0 (1.3) <0.0001*
Presence of ascites, n (%) 13 (45) 9 (60) 0.53
Malignant etiology, n (%) 0.72
 Pancreatic cancer 15 (52) 10 (67)
 Metastatic disease 6 (21) 1 (7)
 Duodenal cancer 3 (10) 2 (13)
 Cholangiocarcinoma 2 (7) 0 (0)
 Hepatocellular carcinoma 1 (3) 0 (0)
  Gastric cancer 2 (7) 2 (13)
*

p‐Value < 0.05 indicates statistical significance.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; EUS‐GJ, endoscopic ultrasound guided‐gastrojejunostomy; R‐GJ, robotic, gastrojejunostomy; PNI, prognostic nutritional index.