Skip to main content
. 2023 May 9;10:1090792. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1090792

TABLE 2.

Comparison the effects of IER and CER on body weight and body composition.

Outcomes Within-group IER vs. CER
IER CER
BW (kg) Trails 20 20 20
MD (95% CI) −5.46 (−6.85, −4.07) −4.94 (−6.47, −3.41) −0.80 (−1.26, −0.33)
Heterogeneity I 2 0 0 0
P 0.94 0.96 0.87
P <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
BMI Trails 8 8 8
MD (95% CI) −2.35 (−2.96, −1.74) −2.27 (−2.95, −1.60) −0.16 (−0.57, 0.24)
Heterogeneity I 2 52 0 50
P 0.04 0.45 0.05
P <0.001 <0.001 0.42
BF (kg) Trails 11 11 11
MD (95% CI) −4.80 (−6.05, −3.55) −2.79 (−4.39, −1.19) −0.75 (−1.73, −0.13)
Heterogeneity I 2 0 0 0
P 0.98 1.00 0.52
P <0.001 <0.001 0.02
FFM (kg) Trails 11 11 11
MD (95% CI) −1.13 (−2.04, −0.23) −1.61 (−2.68, −0.36) −0.49 (−0.92, −0.05)
Heterogeneity I 2 0 0 0
P 1.00 0.95 0.95
P 0.01 0.01 0.03
HC (cm) Trails 10 10 10
MD (95% CI) −4.17 (−5.48, −2.87) −4.10 (−5.28, −2.91) 0.01 (−0.64, 0.67)
Heterogeneity I 2 0 41 25
P 0.66 0.08 0.22
P <0.001 <0.001 0.97

BF, body fat; BMI, body mass index; BW, body weight; CER, continuous energy restriction; CI, confidence interval; FFM, fat free mass; HC, hip circumference; IER, intermittent energy restriction; MD, mean difference.