Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 20;66(3):872–887. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00363

Table 6.

Correlations between perceptual voice ratings and acoustic measures.

Sustained /a/
Continuous speech
Feature Roughness Breathiness Strain Severity Roughness Breathiness Strain Severity
Jitter .79*** .59*** .66*** .71***
Shimmer .77*** .65*** .60*** .71***
HNR −.81*** −.59*** −.64*** −.69***
CPP −.53*** −.74*** −.45** −.67*** .01 −.19 .33* .15
CPP SD .68*** .37** .64*** .61*** −.26 −.40** −.03 −.13
L/H ratio −.17 .01 −.22 −.09 .15 .31* .37** .32*
L/H ratio SD .32* .20 .40** .33* −.20 −.07 −.27 −.20
CSID .78*** .63*** .69*** .75*** .24 .03 −.19 −.05

Note. Em dashes indicate that there are no values to report for these features (i.e., jitter, shimmer, and HNR) for the continuous speech task because they cannot be calculated from continuous speech. HNR = harmonics-to-noise ratio; CPP = cepstral peak prominence; CPP SD = CPP standard deviation; L/H ratio = low–high spectral ratio; L/H ratio SD = L/H ratio standard deviation; CSID: Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia.

*

p ≤ .05.

**

p ≤ .01.

***

p ≤ .001.