Table 3.
Criteria, category, and indicator of stakeholder analysis.
| Criteria | Category | Indicator |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge of forest property rights | Low | Key actor does not know or has a piece of unclear information on forest ownership and management rights holder, the existence of FMU and Village Forest, and the role of FMU and Village Forest |
| High | The key actor knows clear information about forest ownership and management rights holders, the existence of FMU and Village Forest, and the role of FMU and Village Forest. | |
| Position to support or against the existing forest property rights | Support | Key actor indicates support for formal forest ownership and forest rights enacted in the FMU of Berau Barat and Village Forest |
| Opposition | Key actor against formal forest ownership and forest rights in the FMU and Village Forest | |
| Power (ability) to affect forest rights policy | Low | Cannot decide to mobilize resources (human, financial, technology) to affect forest rights policy |
| High | Can make a decision, or part of other systems which can decide to mobilize resources to affect forest rights policy | |
| Interest relates to forest | Forest stand | The key actor prefers to keep the forest as their source of cash and in-kind income |
| Other land uses | The key actor prefers to convert forest and use the land for other purposes |