Table 2.
Table of Purity and Fawlkes Mallows Score (FMS) comparisons between ADEPT and five other popular methods across benchmark datasets
| Methods | Metrics | 151507 | 151508 | 151509 | 151510 | 151673 | 151674 | 151675 | 151676 | BC1 | STARmap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADEPT | Purity | 0.836 | 0.709 | 0.755 | 0.755 | 0.821 | 0.755 | 0.774 | 0.726 | 0.655 | 0.824 |
| FMS | 0.669 | 0.614 | 0.614 | 0.639 | 0.713 | 0.697 | 0.683 | 0.613 | 0.610 | 0.677 | |
| STAGATE | Purity | 0.691 | 0.737 | 0.717 | 0.690 | 0.743 | 0.670 | 0.709 | 0.636 | 0.580 | 0.555 |
| FMS | 0.592 | 0.646 | 0.596 | 0.571 | 0.637 | 0.609 | 0.607 | 0.552 | 0.536 | 0.406 | |
| CCST | Purity | 0.756 | 0.693 | 0.630 | 0.640 | 0.718 | 0.617 | 0.747 | 0.718 | 0.668 | 0.578 |
| FMS | 0.558 | 0.527 | 0.558 | 0.529 | 0.548 | 0.505 | 0.617 | 0.578 | 0.585 | 0.318 | |
| SEDR | Purity | 0.666 | 0.577 | 0.619 | 0.617 | 0.715 | 0.665 | 0.686 | 0.693 | 0.596 | 0.552 |
| FMS | 0.527 | 0.476 | 0.521 | 0.505 | 0.590 | 0.542 | 0.554 | 0.552 | 0.545 | 0.353 | |
| SpaGCN | Purity | 0.694 | 0.620 | 0.681 | 0.667 | 0.674 | 0.574 | 0.617 | 0.556 | 0.657 | 0.461 |
| FMS | 0.551 | 0.503 | 0.573 | 0.570 | 0.556 | 0.502 | 0.502 | 0.461 | 0.606 | 0.496 | |
| BayesSpace | Purity | 0.620 | 0.532 | 0.578 | 0.545 | 0.666 | 0.536 | 0.582 | 0.555 | 0.537 | 0.441 |
| FMS | 0.491 | 0.453 | 0.468 | 0.438 | 0.552 | 0.440 | 0.455 | 0.441 | 0.528 | 0.379 |
The highest average purity and FMS in each column are highlighted.