Skip to main content
. 2023 May 3;26(6):106792. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106792

Table 2.

Table of Purity and Fawlkes Mallows Score (FMS) comparisons between ADEPT and five other popular methods across benchmark datasets

Methods Metrics 151507 151508 151509 151510 151673 151674 151675 151676 BC1 STARmap
ADEPT Purity 0.836 0.709 0.755 0.755 0.821 0.755 0.774 0.726 0.655 0.824
FMS 0.669 0.614 0.614 0.639 0.713 0.697 0.683 0.613 0.610 0.677
STAGATE Purity 0.691 0.737 0.717 0.690 0.743 0.670 0.709 0.636 0.580 0.555
FMS 0.592 0.646 0.596 0.571 0.637 0.609 0.607 0.552 0.536 0.406
CCST Purity 0.756 0.693 0.630 0.640 0.718 0.617 0.747 0.718 0.668 0.578
FMS 0.558 0.527 0.558 0.529 0.548 0.505 0.617 0.578 0.585 0.318
SEDR Purity 0.666 0.577 0.619 0.617 0.715 0.665 0.686 0.693 0.596 0.552
FMS 0.527 0.476 0.521 0.505 0.590 0.542 0.554 0.552 0.545 0.353
SpaGCN Purity 0.694 0.620 0.681 0.667 0.674 0.574 0.617 0.556 0.657 0.461
FMS 0.551 0.503 0.573 0.570 0.556 0.502 0.502 0.461 0.606 0.496
BayesSpace Purity 0.620 0.532 0.578 0.545 0.666 0.536 0.582 0.555 0.537 0.441
FMS 0.491 0.453 0.468 0.438 0.552 0.440 0.455 0.441 0.528 0.379

The highest average purity and FMS in each column are highlighted.