Table 3.
Agronomic effectiveness of Actinomycetota-RP combination in alkaline/acidic soil compared with BG4 In alkaline soil.
| Soil type | Treatments | Shoot dry weight | Root dry weight | Spike biomass | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RP1 | RP2 | RP3 | RP4 | RP1 | RP2 | RP3 | RP4 | RP1 | RP2 | RP3 | RP4 | ||
| Alkaline soil | P16 | – | – | +25%a | +25.2%b | – | +2.188%c | +30.7%e | – | – | – | +35.5%a | +54%c |
| P18 | – | – | +13.8%b | +17%c | +18.5%a | +15.15%b | +69.5%b | – | – | – | +28.2%b | +82%b | |
| BC3 | +1.029%b | – | – | +42.8%a | +5.51%b | – | +47.6%d | +7.4%b | +6.43%a | – | – | +97%a | |
| BC10 | +5.51%a | – | +4.5%d | +3.8%d | – | +38.58%a | +59%cd | – | +4.02%b | +2.43%b | +26%b | +35.6%d | |
| BC11 | – | +11.88%ab | +7%c | +31.36%b | +1.60%c | – | +90%a | +27.43a | +6.70%a | +37.69%a | +23.3%c | +59%c | |
| Acidic soil | P16 | – | +9.22%c | +32.50%a | – | +12.31%c | +7.70%a | +13.04%b | – | – | +11.15%c | +29.82%bc | – |
| P18 | +39.29%a | – | +10.89%c | +27.93%a | +28.64%b | – | – | +12.17%d | +76.87%b | – | +6.14%d | +51.85%c | |
| BC3 | +39.60%a | +16.86%b | +10%c | +24.72%a | +39.95%a | – | – | +21.95%c | +115%a | +40.28%b | +20.17%c | +59.25%b | |
| BC10 | +0.83%c | +8.57%c | +29.14%b | +15.33%b | – | – | – | +30.86%b | +51.87%c | +14.38%c | +124.12%a | +54.62%b | |
| BC11 | +28.17%b | +27.4%a | +28.07%b | +8.52%c | +33.91%ab | +5.67%b | +39.95%a | +38.26%a | +110.62%a | +53.6%a | +72.37%b | +80.55%a | |
Different letters indicate significant differences (p <0.05).