Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 May 24.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatrics. 2020 Feb 21;145(3):e20191207. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-1207

Table 2:

Pediatricians’ Attitudes Regarding the Vaccines for Children (VFC) Program (n=369).

Strongly agree % (n) Somewhat agree % (n) Somewhat disagree % (n) Strongly disagree % (n) Don’t know % (n)
Participating in the VFC program is valuable because it allows practices to administer vaccines to children regardless of ability to pay 93 (338) 4 (15) 1 (3) 0 (1) 2 (7)
The VFC program improves access to childhood vaccines 90 (328) 7 (24) 0 1 (3) 2 (8)
The VFC program is valuable because it allows children to be vaccinated in the medical home 88 (320) 7 (25) 1 (2) 1 (3) 4 (13)
On average, the payment for VFC vaccine administration is less than the payment from private health plans 34 (123) 20 (74) 3 (12) 1 (2) 42 (151)
The requirements regarding monitoring, tracking, and recording of VFC storage temperatures are a burden on practices 23 (82) 45 (163) 10 (35) 13 (46) 10 (38)
The requirements to replace lost doses of VFC vaccine is a major burden on practices 20 (73) 28 (101) 17 (61) 11 (39) 25 (89)
Keeping VFC stock separate from private vaccine stock is a major burden on practices 16 (57) 36 (130) 18 (66) 22 (80) 8 (30)
Billing for vaccine administration fees for Medicaid patients is challenging with the VFC program 9 (34) 18 (64) 28 (102) 20 (72) 25 (89)