Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 May 24.
Published in final edited form as: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Nov 14;10(2):386–394. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.11.003

TABLE III.

Methods of assessment of nonadherence4,5762

Patient self-report
Pro: Con:
 • Allows for collection of information about patient beliefs, attitudes, and experiences over time  • Variable validity, may overstimate adherence
 • Less expensive  • Limited by the patient’s memory
Medical chart review
Pro: Con:
 • Provides information about adherence concerns  • Concerns of nonadherence are not systematically charted
 • Highlights barriers to adherence  • Less objective information about the patient’ s adherence patterns
 • Provides biochemical measurements
 • Provides pharmacy refill data
Pharmacy/refill prescription refill data
Pro: Con:
 • Objective data  • Cannot assess the daily pattern of medication use
Electronic medication measurement
Pro: Con:
 • Assess long-term patterns of adherence with detailed information  • Does not confirm medication was ingested
 • More costly, less applicable for large-scale clinical use
Biochemical measurements
Pro: Con:
 • Objective data  • Detection may depend on dose of medication, may need additional dose-ranging pharmacokinetic studies in lower doses of medication
 • No clear cutoff for “good” adherence
FeNO measurement and suppression
Pro: Con:
 • Objective data  • No single cutoff for “good” adherence