Table 4.
Summary statistics from the PERMANOVA analysis from the loadings of dimension 1–4 of the MFA comparing Cyrtodactylusthongphaphumensis sp. nov. to all other species the Cyrtodactylusbrevipalmatus group with sample sizes > 1. Bold fonts denote significant differences.
| OTU pairs | F model | R2 | p-value | p-adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C.rukhadeva | 88.504 | 0.847 | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| C.cf.ngati2 | 56.471 | 0.876 | 0.020 | 1.000 |
| C.ngati3 | 59.321 | 0.868 | 0.006 | 0.324 |
| C.interdigitalis | 85.773 | 0.896 | 0.002 | 0.112 |
| C.ngati | 134.367 | 0.937 | 0.006 | 0.332 |
| C.brevipalmatus | 80.229 | 0.879 | 0.001 | 0.025 |
| C.fluvicavus | 55.127 | 0.809 | 0.000 | 0.008 |
| C.rivularis | 9.485 | 0.542 | 0.022 | 1.000 |
| C. sp. 13 | 30.716 | 0.793 | 0.022 | 1.000 |