Skip to main content
. 2023 May 24;2023(5):CD015201. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015201

Vousden 2021.

Study characteristics
Notes English title
The incidence, characteristics and outcomes of pregnant women hospitalized with symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in the UK from March to September 2020: a national cohort study using the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS) (preprint)
Study setting
Start of study recruitment (MM/YYYY): 03/2020
End of study recruitment (MM/YYYY): 08/2020
Study design: Prospective cohort
Study centre(s): Multiple centres/clinics/areas within a country
Number of centres, clinics or areas: 194
Study setting: Inpatient
Number of participants recruited: 1148 (cohort 1), 722 (cohort 2), 426 (cohort 3)
Sampling method: Consecutive participants
Participants
Female participants (absolute number): 2296
Age measure, value: Median (IQR), NR
Inclusion criteria: Women who were hospitalised from 1st March 2020 to 31st August 2020. Hospital admission was defined as a hospital stay of 24 hours or longer for any cause, or admission of any duration to give birth. Women were taken as confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 if they were hospitalised during pregnancy or within two days of giving birth and had a positive test during or within seven days of admission, or they were symptomatic and had evidence of pneumonia on imaging which was typical of SARS‐CoV‐2.
Exclusion criteria: Women were excluded if they did not meet this case definition.
Smoking frequency: 99 (cohort 1), 42 (cohort 2), 57 (cohort 3)
Diabetes frequency: 28 (cohort 1), 22 (cohort 2), 6 (cohort 3)
Hypertension frequency: 26 (cohort 1), 24 (cohort 2), 2 (cohort 3)
Cardiovascular disease frequency: 21 (cohort 1), 13 (cohort 2), 8 (cohort 3)
Asthma frequency: 77 (cohort 1), 49 (cohort 2), 28 (cohort 3)
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease frequency: NR
Other pulmonary disease frequency: NR
Immunosuppression frequency: NR
Chronic kidney disease frequency: NR
Cancer frequency: NR
Steroid administration frequency: NR
Supplemental oxygen administration frequency: NR
Other treatments (frequency): NR
Prognostic factor(s)
Study’s definition for obesity: NR
The time when obesity has been measured: NR
Main variable used for determination of obesity: BMI
Threshold used for definition: NR
Obesity frequency (absolute number): 345 (cohort 1), 235 (cohort 2), 110 (cohort 3)
Prognostic factor(s): Overweight  
Obese
Outcome(s)
Hospitalisation 
Outcome (prognostic factor)
Hospitalisation (overweight) (cohort 1) 
Follow‐up
Number of patients followed completely for the outcome: 1148
Number of obese patients followed completely for the outcome: 345
Number of non‐obese patients followed completely for the outcome: 757
Univariable unadjusted analysis for obesity
Effect measure for obesity: Odds ratio
Effect measure value (95% CI), P value: 1.58 (1.26, 1.99), NR
Multivariable analysis for obesity
Modelling method: Logistic regression
The set of prognostic factors used for adjustment: Any previous medical problem, BMI, ethnicity, smoking
Effect measure for obesity: Odds ratio
Effect measure value (95% CI), P value: 1.52 (1.18, 1.95), NR
Outcome (prognostic factor)
Hospitalisation (obese) (cohort 1) 
Follow‐up
Number of patients followed completely for the outcome: 1148
Number of obese patients followed completely for the outcome: 345
Number of non‐obese patients followed completely for the outcome: 757
Univariable unadjusted analysis for obesity
Effect measure for obesity: Odds ratio
Effect measure value (95% CI), P value: 1.83 (1.45, 2.33), NR
Multivariable analysis for obesity
Modelling method: Logistic regression
The set of prognostic factors used for adjustment: Any previous medical problem, BMI, ethnicity, smoking
Effect measure for obesity: Odds ratio
Effect measure value (95% CI), P value: 1.75 (1.33, 2.27), NR
Outcome (prognostic factor)
Hospitalisation (overweight) (cohort 2) 
Follow‐up
Number of patients followed completely for the outcome: 722
Number of obese patients followed completely for the outcome: 235
Number of non‐obese patients followed completely for the outcome: 458
Univariable unadjusted analysis for obesity
Effect measure for obesity: Odds ratio
Effect measure value (95% CI), P value: 2 (1.54, 2.58), NR
Multivariable analysis for obesity
Modelling method: Logistic regression
The set of prognostic factors used for adjustment: Any previous medical problem, BMI, ethnicity, smoking
Effect measure for obesity: Odds ratio
Effect measure value (95% CI), P value: 1.86 (1.39, 2.48), NR
Outcome (prognostic factor)
Hospitalisation (obese) (cohort 2) 
Follow‐up
Number of patients followed completely for the outcome: 722
Number of obese patients followed completely for the outcome: 235
Number of non‐obese patients followed completely for the outcome: 458
Univariable unadjusted analysis for obesity
Effect measure for obesity: Odds ratio
Effect measure value (95% CI), P value: 2.31 (1.77, 3.01), NR
Multivariable analysis for obesity
Modelling method: Logistic regression
The set of prognostic factors used for adjustment: Any previous medical problem, BMI, ethnicity, smoking
Effect measure for obesity: Odds ratio
Effect measure value (95% CI), P value: 2.07 (1.53, 2.79), NR
Outcome (prognostic factor)
Hospitalisation (overweight) (cohort 3) 
Follow‐up
Number of patients followed completely for the outcome: 426
Number of obese patients followed completely for the outcome: 110
Number of non‐obese patients followed completely for the outcome: 299
Univariable unadjusted analysis for obesity
Effect measure for obesity: Odds ratio
Effect measure value (95% CI), P value: 1.1 (1.27, 1.48), NR
Multivariable analysis for obesity
Modelling method: NR
The set of prognostic factors used for adjustment: NR
Effect measure for obesity: NR
Effect measure value (95% CI), P value: 1.52 (1.18, 1.95), NR
Outcome (prognostic factor)
Hospitalisation (obese) (cohort 3) 
Follow‐up
Number of patients followed completely for the outcome: 426
Number of obese patients followed completely for the outcome: 110
Number of non‐obese patients followed completely for the outcome: 299
Univariable unadjusted analysis for obesity
Effect measure for obesity: Odds ratio
Effect measure value (95% CI), P value: 1.27 (0.94, 1.72), NR
Multivariable analysis for obesity
Modelling method: NR
The set of prognostic factors used for adjustment: NR
Effect measure for obesity: NR
Effect measure value (95% CI), P value: NR
 
Item Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Study Participation No Appendix 3
Study Attrition
Hospitalisation Unclear Appendix 3
Prognostic Factor Measurement No Appendix 3
Outcome Measurement
Hospitalisation Yes Appendix 3
Confounding Bias
Hospitalisation Unclear Appendix 3
Statistical Analysis Bias No Appendix 3