Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Feb 3.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Sci Atmos. 2023 Feb 3;3:521–536. doi: 10.1039/d2ea00142j

Table 4:

Associations between the degradation outcomes (% of flagged measurements and correction error) and year of operation of the PurpleAir sensors. Note that we did not have any PurpleAir sensors collocated with a regulatory monitor in Sub Arctic and Cold Climates. In addition, all PurpleAir monitors collocated with regulatory monitors were outdoor.

Associations (95% Confidence Interval)
Dataset Percentage of
Flagged
Measurements
Correction Error
All 0.93* (0.91, 0.94) −0.12* (−0.13, −0.10)
Device Location
  Inside −0.10* (−0.12, −0.09) -
  Outside 1.06* (1.05, 1.08) -
Climate Zone (Outside Devices Only)
  Cold 0.74* (0.71, 0.76) −0.27* (−0.29, −0.25)
  Hot-Dry 2.09* (2.07, 2.12) 0.08* (0.06, 0.09)
  Hot-Humid 0.34* (0.32, 0.37) −0.92* (−1.10, −0.75)
  Marine 0.41* (0.39, 0.44) −0.13* (−0.15, −0.10)
  Mixed-Dry −0.05* (−0.07, −0.02) −0.31* (−0.40, −0.21)
  Mixed-Humid 0.54* (0.51, 0.57) −0.28* (−0.33, −0.23)
  Sub Arctic −0.18* (−0.22, −0.14) -
  Very Cold 0.13* (0.10, 0.16) -
*

p<0.05