Skip to main content
. 2023 May 24;80(7):700–709. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.1012

Table 2. Performance on False Memory Measures for Individuals With Delusions at Baseline vs the Control Groupa.

False memory measure Control group (n = 549)b Group with delusions at baseline (n = 42)c Control group vs group with delusions at baselined
ADAS-Cog 13
False recognition (maximum total score of 12) 2 (0 to 4) 3 (1 to 6) U = 9398.5; P = .04
Discrimination 1.5 (0.9 to 2.1) 1.3 (0.8 to 1.6) U = 9451.0; P = .05
Response bias, mean (SD) −0.1 (0.6) −0.0 (0.7) t594 = −1.29; P = .20
RAVLT
False recognition (maximum total score of 15) 2 (1 to 4) 2.5 (1 to 4) U = 9806.0; P = .11
Discrimination 1.1 (0.5 to 1.7) 0.7 (0.4 to 1.1) U = 8738.5; P = .009
Response bias −0.4 (−0.8 to −0.1) −0.5 (−0.8 to −0.1) U = 11 078.5; P = .69
Intrusions (maximum total score of 120) 4 (2 to 9) 6 (2 to 8) U = 10 245.0; P = .55

Abbreviations: ADAS-Cog 13, 13-item Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Subscale; RAVLT, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test.

a

Unless indicated otherwise, values are presented as the median (IQR).

b

In the control group, there were 548 participants for RAVLT false recognition and 543 for RAVLT intrusions.

c

In the group with delusions, there were 40 participants for RAVLT intrusions.

d

For means (SDs), t values are presented with degrees of freedom. For medians (IQRs), U values are presented.