Skip to main content
. 2023 May 12;8(20):17880–17890. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c00955

Table 1. Previously Reported Dye Removal Study Using Different Agriculture Wastes, Explored as Low-Cost Adsorbents.

agriculture waste dyes time duration percentage removal (%) references
banana bark, banana peel powder basic violet 10, Rhodamine B 40, 60 min 85.0, 81.01 (50, 61)
tamarind shell CR 4 h 83.0 (51)
neem leaf powder CR 5 h 99.0 (52)
rice husk direct F. Scarlet, malachite green, and MB 90, 40, 30 min 80.0, 94.41, 95.0 (53, 55, 56)
neem bark malachite green 7 h 88.45 (54)
mango bark malachite green 7 h 99.45  
wheat straw basic yellow 21 48 h 50.9 (57)
mangrove bark direct red-23 4 h 90.0 (58)
P. oceanica leaf reactive red 23 10 h 80.0 (59)
teak tree bark MB 30 min 97.0 (60)
tapioca peel waste rhodamine B 120 min 90.4 (62)
pomegranate peels rhodamine B 10 min 89.8 (63)
STLs reactive green 19; reactive violet 5, MB 60, 60, 200 min 98.8, 72.8, 98.0 (64, 65)
STL modified with polyethyleneimine (PEI-STL) reactive black 5 and methyl orange 150 min 97.59 (31)
STL/ZIS composite CR, MB, and CV 120, 120, 120 min 77.18, 85.36, 91.29 present work