Skip to main content
. 2022 May 6;29(3):417–422. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izac099

Table 2.

Outcomes of patients who underwent diversion surgery for perianal disease vs those who underwent diversion surgery for all other indications

Indication for Diversion Surgery Number of Patients Subsequent Proctectomy Outcome Retained Excluded Rectum Outcome Reconnected Rectum Outcome Percentage of Patients Who Underwent Subsequent Proctectomy
Mount Sinai Hospital
Perianal disease 26 14 7 5 54%
All other indications 55 23 18 14 42%
University of Chicago
Perianal disease 21 14 3 4 67%
All other indications 29 10 5 14 34%
Humanitas University Rozzano Milano
Perianal disease 6 4 1 1 67%
All other indications 16 6 4 6 37%
Mount Sinai Health System
Perianal disease 9 9 0 0 100%
All other indications 12 2 6 4 17%
Utrecht University
Perianal disease 2 2 0 0 100%
All other indications 4 4 0 0 100%
Weill Cornell Medical Center
Perianal disease 1 0 1 0 0%
All other indications 5 3 2 0 60%
Northwell Health system
Perianal disease 2 1 0 1 50%
All other indications 4 0 3 1 0%
NYU Health system
Perianal disease 0 0 0 0 0%
All other indications 5 0 5 0 0%
Total
Perianal disease 67 44 12 11 66%
All other indications 130 48 43 39 37%