Table 2.
Outcomes of patients who underwent diversion surgery for perianal disease vs those who underwent diversion surgery for all other indications
Indication for Diversion Surgery | Number of Patients | Subsequent Proctectomy Outcome | Retained Excluded Rectum Outcome | Reconnected Rectum Outcome | Percentage of Patients Who Underwent Subsequent Proctectomy |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mount Sinai Hospital | |||||
Perianal disease | 26 | 14 | 7 | 5 | 54% |
All other indications | 55 | 23 | 18 | 14 | 42% |
University of Chicago | |||||
Perianal disease | 21 | 14 | 3 | 4 | 67% |
All other indications | 29 | 10 | 5 | 14 | 34% |
Humanitas University Rozzano Milano | |||||
Perianal disease | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 67% |
All other indications | 16 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 37% |
Mount Sinai Health System | |||||
Perianal disease | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
All other indications | 12 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 17% |
Utrecht University | |||||
Perianal disease | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
All other indications | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
Weill Cornell Medical Center | |||||
Perianal disease | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0% |
All other indications | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60% |
Northwell Health system | |||||
Perianal disease | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50% |
All other indications | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0% |
NYU Health system | |||||
Perianal disease | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
All other indications | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0% |
Total | |||||
Perianal disease | 67 | 44 | 12 | 11 | 66% |
All other indications | 130 | 48 | 43 | 39 | 37% |