Table 4.
Comparison of evaluation results of the backbone model against the proposed model.
AI Model | Optimizer | Learning Rate/Loss Function | ACC | SEN | SPE | PRE | F1_Score | AUC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Backbone | Adam | /Categorical smooth loss | 0.95 | 0.91 | 0.97 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.94 |
Proposed | 0.96 | 0.92 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.95 | ||
Backbone | Categorical smooth loss | 0.94 | 0.88 | 0.96 | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.92 | |
Proposed | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.98 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.96 | ||
Backbone | /Categorical cross-entropy | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.95 | |
Proposed | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.97 | ||
Backbone | Categorical cross-entropy | 0.84 | 0.67 | 0.89 | 0.78 | 0.65 | 0.78 | |
Proposed | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.97 | ||
Backbone | SGD | /Categorical smooth loss | 0.94 | 0.88 | 0.96 | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.92 |
Proposed | 0.94 | 0.88 | 0.96 | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.92 | ||
Backbone | Categorical smooth loss | 0.94 | 0.88 | 0.96 | 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.92 | |
Proposed | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.98 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.96 | ||
Backbone | /Categorical cross-entropy | 0.94 | 0.89 | 0.96 | 0.90 | 0.89 | 0.92 | |
Proposed | 0.95 | 0.89 | 0.96 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.93 | ||
Backbone | Categorical cross-entropy | 0.70 | 0.40 | 0.80 | 0.58 | 0.32 | 0.60 | |
Proposed | 0.95 | 0.89 | 0.96 | 0.92 | 0.89 | 0.93 |