Table 4. Summary of Findings From Generalized Estimating Equations Analysis of Nonadherence to Lung-RADS Recommendations Measured Over Time Among 830 Patients in Experiment 2.
| Comparison of interest | Nonadherence to T1 Lung-RADS recommendations | Nonadherence to T2 Lung-RADS recommendations | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AOR (95% CI)a | P value | AOR (95% CI)a | P value | |
| Baseline Lung-RADS score of 1 or 2 | ||||
| Unchanged subsequently vs T0 | 1.38 (1.12-1.69) | .002 | 1.17 (0.90-1.52) | .23 |
| Upgraded subsequently vs T0 | 0.29 (0.14-0.60) | <.001 | 0.44 (0.19-1.01) | .054 |
| Baseline Lung-RADS score of 3 or 4 | ||||
| Unchanged subsequently vs T0 | 1.81 (0.62-5.22) | .28 | 1.34 (0.16-10.9) | .78 |
| Downgraded subsequently vs T0 | 5.08 (1.28-20.1) | .02 | 6.99 (0.66-74.1) | .11 |
Abbreviations: AOR, adjusted odds ratio; Lung-RADS, Lung CT Screening Reporting & Data System; T0, first screening time point; T1, second screening time point; T2, third screening time point.
a
Adjusted baseline variables included baseline Lung-RADS score, family history of lung cancer, educational level, median household income, age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and type of referring physician.