Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 3;29(4):530–537. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2023.78622

Table 3.

The results of ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are given and compared according to the injury zones.

ZONE TP (n, %) TN (n, %) FP FN (n, %) p TP (n, %) TN (n, %) FP FN (n, %) p
1 5 (60.50) 0 0 3 (37.50) 3 (75.00) 0 0 1 (25.00)
2 6 (42.86) 2 (14.29) 1 5 (35.71) 7 (70.00) 1 (10.00) 0 2 (24.00)
3 8 (88.89) 0 (7.14) 1 (11.11) 1 (16.67) 1 (16.67) 0 4 (66.67)
4 2 (100) 0 0 0 0.680 0 0 0 0 0.420
5 9 (90.00) 0 0 1 (10.00) 5 (83.33) 0 0 1 (16.67)
6 2 (100) 0 0 0 1 (100) 0 0 0
7 1 (50.00) 0 0 1 (50.00) 0 0 0 1 (100)

TP: True positive, TN: True negative, FP: False positive, FN: False negatvie.