Table 4.
95% CL | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Predictors | B | LB | UB | sr2 | r |
Capability | −0.36 | −0.38 | −0.33 | 0.12 | −0.65 ** |
Social opportunity | 0.01 | −0.03 | 0.04 | 0.00 | −0.48 ** |
Cat welfare motivation | −0.10 | −0.13 | −0.07 | 0.01 | −0.55 ** |
Community motivation | −0.11 | −0.14 | −0.08 | 0.01 | −0.52 ** |
Cat owner age | 0.00 | −0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.04 * |
Cat owner gender | 0.04 | −0.01 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.05 ** |
Location | −0.01 | −0.05 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
Type of dwelling | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 0.17 ** |
Access to outdoor space | 0.04 | −0.01 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.06 ** |
Home ownership | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.10 ** |
Number of cats owned | 0.01 | −0.01 | 0.02 | 0.00 | −0.03 |
Model: R = 0.69, R2 = 0.47, Adjusted R2 = 0.47, F = 337.54 and p < 0.001. B unstandardised beta coefficient, CL Confidence limits, LB Lower boundary, UB upper boundary, sr2 squared semi-partial correlation (unique variation explained by each predictor), r Pearson correlation, * significant at 0.05 level (2 tailed) and ** significant at 0.01 level (2 tailed). Note R2 is not just the sum of all the individual squared semi-partial correlations but also constitutes a portion that is due to within correlation between two independent variables.