Table 6.
Multiple hierarchical regression analysis predicting executive function at t2.
Model | Variables | Executive Function a | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
β | t | p | ||
Model 1 | Age | −0.24 | −0.96 | 0.347 |
Sex | 0.16 | 0.92 | 0.366 | |
Education | 0.43 | 2.17 | 0.041 | |
Time difference t1–t2 | 0.13 | 0.76 | 0.458 | |
BDI | −0.14 | −0.82 | 0.418 | |
Illness duration | 0.08 | 0.38 | 0.710 | |
Model 2 | Age | −0.12 | 0.58 | 0.576 |
Sex | 0.35 | 1.89 | 0.074 | |
Education | 0.41 | 2.26 | 0.036 | |
Time difference t1–t2 | 0.56 | 2.60 | 0.018 | |
BDI | 0.38 | 1.66 | 0.113 | |
Illness duration | 0.09 | 0.47 | 0.644 | |
Openness | −0.05 | −0.32 | 0.753 | |
Conscientiousness | 0.48 | 2.55 | 0.019 | |
Extraversion | −0.30 | −1.44 | 0.166 | |
Agreeableness | −0.09 | −0.51 | 0.616 | |
Neuroticism | −0.82 | −3.30 | 0.004 |
Note. Model 1: R2 = 0.38, R2 corr. = 0.23, SE = 1.48. Model 2: R2 = 0.65, R2 corr. = 0.45, SE = 1.25. Significant p-values (p < 0.05) are written in bold. a Sum score of the Trail Making Test part B and the interference trial of J. Stroop’s Color and Word Interference Test.