Table 3.
Genetic Marker | Applications/ Advantages |
Limitations/ Recommendations |
References |
---|---|---|---|
STR | Technical robustness and high variation among individuals; several commercial kits; high level of discrimination, standardized across laboratories |
PCR artifacts; highly degraded or low template DNA; certain degree of linkage between some STR markers | [8,80,81,82] |
Y-chromosome STR | Gender identification, resolving paternity and family structures | Database sufficiently large and continuously expanded; samples need to be collected randomly; each haplotype submission must include metadata |
[83] |
X-chromosome STR | Gender identification, resolving paternity and family structures | Evaluation of DNA mixture profiles and linked markers | [81] |
Autosomal SNPs | Individual identification; information about physical traits |
Highly degraded or low template DNA | [81] |
Mitochondrial DNA | High copy number per cell; useful in degraded samples; existence of rich population databases; software tools for phylogenetic checks and data quality control |
Inter-laboratory differences about the interpretation of length and point heteroplasmy; not used for individual or breed identification | [60] |