Skip to main content
. 2023 May 26;2023(5):CD011334. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011334.pub3

Summary of findings 2. NPWT compared with moist wound healing.

Population: adults with pressure ulcers
Setting: hospitals
Intervention: NPWT 
Comparison: moist wound healing
Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect(95% CI) Number of participants(studies) Certainty of the evidence(GRADE) Comments
Risk with NPWT (plus standard care) Risk with NPWT (plus standard care)
The proportion of pressure ulcers healed  
This outcome was not reported for this comparison.
Time to complete wound healing  
This outcome was not reported for this comparison.
Adverse events
 
 
This outcome was not reported for this comparison.

CI: Confidence interval; NPWT: negative pressure wound therapy

GRADE Working Group grades of evidenceHigh certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.