Summary of findings 2. NPWT compared with moist wound healing.
Population: adults with pressure ulcers Setting: hospitals Intervention: NPWT Comparison: moist wound healing | ||||||
Outcomes | Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) | Relative effect (95% CI) | Number of participants (studies) | Certainty of the evidence (GRADE) | Comments | |
Risk with NPWT (plus standard care) | Risk with NPWT (plus standard care) | |||||
The proportion of pressure ulcers healed | This outcome was not reported for this comparison. |
|||||
Time to complete wound healing | This outcome was not reported for this comparison. |
|||||
Adverse events |
This outcome was not reported for this comparison. |
CI: Confidence interval; NPWT: negative pressure wound therapy
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect. Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different. Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect. Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.