Skip to main content
. 2023 May 12;6:1181812. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1181812

Table 5.

The calculated distance (cm) between real and predicted ETT locations.

Group Loss function Distance (cm)
Fold1 Fold2 Fold3 Fold4 Fold5 Mean
Region-based loss Dice 0.3244 0.3741 0.6841 0.6814 0.5624 0.5253
Tversky 0.7420 0.4166 0.5843 0.5407 0.4392 0.5446
Jaccard 0.3909 0.5124 1.6230 0.7222 0.5468 0.7591
Average = 0.6096
Distribution-based loss BCE 0.3847 0.4069 0.4670 0.3993 0.3498 0.4015
Focal 0.2225 0.4317 0.3255 0.4192 0.4765 0.3751
MCC 0.2996 0.4503 0.4447 0.3289 0.4114 0.3870
Average = 0.3878
Compound loss BCE-Dice 0.1835 0.2579 0.3905 0.3385 0.2803 0.2901
BCE-Jaccard 0.1728 0.4875 0.3546 0.3446 0.3897 0.3498
BCE-Tversky 0.2464 0.3244 0.4573 0.3880 0.3897 0.3611
Focal-Dice 0.2180 0.5053 0.2742 0.3420 0.3489 0.3377
Focal-Jaccard 0.2154 0.3368 0.3352 0.3454 0.2734 0.3012
Focal-Tversky 0.2304 0.2455 0.3052 0.2899 0.4418 0.3168
MCC-Dice 0.1959 0.3377 0.4748 0.3506 0.4079 0.3534
MCC-Tversky 0.2358 0.3014 0.4137 0.4270 0.4019 0.3560
MCC-Jaccard 0.3608 0.2420 0.3449 0.3897 0.3993 0.3473
Average = 0.3348

The bold value indicates the minimum average error on different studied folds.