Skip to main content
Eye logoLink to Eye
. 2022 Jul 22;37(8):1558–1565. doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-02182-4

Impaired sleep quality in children with allergic conjunctivitis and their parents

Jing Li 1,#, Shi-yao Zhang 1,#, Zixin Fan 1, Ren Liu 1, Ling Jin 1, Lingyi Liang 1,
PMCID: PMC10220017  PMID: 35869391

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the sleep quality in children with allergic conjunctivitis (AC) and their parents.

Methods

Prospective, case-controlled study. Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, a tertiary referral centre. Participants comprised 73 children aged 4–12 years with AC and their parents, and 81 healthy, age-matched children who served as controls and their parents. General information was recorded and ocular manifestations of children with AC were scored. Sleep quality of the children and parents were assessed using Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).

Results

Children with AC and their parents had reduced sleep quality (Children’s CSHQ: 48.3 ± 6.55 vs. 38.8 ± 4.63; Parental PSQI: 5.62 ± 2.12 vs. 3.40 ± 1.90, both p < 0.001) and significantly higher prevalence of poor sleep quality (CSHQ ≥ 41 in Children: 89.0% vs. 23.5%; PSQI > 7 in Parents: 18.5% vs. 1.23%, both p < 0.001). Children with AC scored worse on subcomponents of CSHQ including sleep onset delay, sleep duration, parasomnia, sleep-disordered breathing, and daytime sleepiness. Parents scored worse on subscores of PSQI including sleep duration, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime sleepiness. Poor sleep quality in children with AC was associated with follicle formation (OR:3.95; 95% CI: 1.88–8.31, p < 0.001) and keratitis (OR:6.03; 95% CI: 1.29–28.3, p = 0.028). Parental poor sleep quality was associated with follicle formation (OR:7.14; 95% CI: 2.06–24.8, p = 0.002) and keratitis (OR:4.49; 95% CI: 1.27–15.9, p = 0.020) in children.

Conclusions

AC has a negative association with sleep quality in children and their parents, especially in those children with severe follicle formation and keratitis.

State the details of Clinical Trials

Chictr.org.cn, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=43511, ChiCTR1900027486.

Statement of significance

Allergic conjunctivitis is a frequently encountered problem diagnosed and managed by ophthalmologists, paediatricians, allergists, and primary care physicians and has become a major public health issue. Sleep is crucial for learning and effective development in children. Our study discovered a strong association between these two conditions. This is the first study to evaluate the association of allergic conjunctivitis and sleep quality in children and their parents. This case-controlled study found that allergic conjunctivitis had a negative impact on sleep quality not only for children but also for their parents. The findings of this study suggest a multifaceted impact of AC with sleep quality; detailed assessment of sleep quality for improved care of paediatric patients with allergic conjunctivitis would be useful.

Subject terms: Conjunctival diseases, Paediatrics

Introduction

Sleep is an important determinant of health and quality of life [1, 2]. In particular, sleep is crucial for learning and effective development in children [35]. In recent years, sleep disorders have become one of the major health concerns globally [6, 7]. A variety of diseases, including eye diseases such as dry eye and primary glaucoma, have been found to potentially correlated with sleep disorders, which can in turn exacerbate the condition, creating a vicious cycle [812]. However, as for children, currently the association between eye diseases and sleep quality has been reported only in myopia [1315].

Allergic conjunctivitis (AC), one of the most common eye diseases, is affecting 40% of the American population and 15–20% of the Japanese population [1620]. AC tends to attack children more than adults [18]. The underlying mechanisms were hypersensitivity reactions, mainly type I and type IV, of the conjunctiva to allergens [21]. There are five types of AC including perennial allergic conjunctivitis (PAC), seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC), vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC), atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC), and giant papillary conjunctivitis (GPC) [18, 22]. SAC/PAC are type I allergic reactions and accounts for 74–95% total AC [21]. VKC/AKC are a combination of both type I and type IV allergic reactions and are relatively more severe as they may involve the cornea. GPC is usually induced by foreign body reaction such as contact lens, filtering tubes, etc. [18]. AC is mainly characterised by itching, redness, and tearing of the eyes, and in severe cases it can cause visual impairment [18, 2325].

AC tends to have a long and recurrent course [16, 17]. We speculated that chronic eye discomfort of AC especially itching may affect the sleep quality of the children, and the impact of chronic childhood illness also falls on the parents [26]. Herein, we for the first time, conducted a cross-sectional observational survey to assess if and how AC potentially disturbs the sleep quality of paediatric patients and if so, whether their parents are also involved. In this study, a verified Chinese version for sleep quality assessment in children and adults respectively were used, and the association between sleep quality impairment and potential confounders such as eye conditions were further analysed and discussed.

Methods

This prospective, case-controlled study was conducted at the cornea outpatient department of Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center from November 2019 through January 2020 in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration of Human Studies and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University (ChiCTR1900027486). We screened the notes of all children attending our clinic in advance to identify those who met the inclusion criteria. These children then were approached consecutively for inclusion in the study. For those who did not wish to take part, we denoted the reasons given, we addressed any questions before obtaining written consent and assent.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Children with AC aged younger than 12 years old and their parents were enroled. The diagnosis of AC was based on the AAO’s diagnostic criteria for allergic conjunctivitis [17, 25]. Exclusion criteria were: inability to communicate, allergic to fluorescein, any other ocular disorders except mild ametropia, any history of ocular surgery or trauma, history of other active allergic diseases in the past one year, any history of mental or sleep disorders or other systemic diseases, history of oral antiallergy pills such as glycocorticosteroids and antihistamines within 6 months. Healthy control children younger than 12 years and their parents were recruited from those receiving routine ophthalmic examination or refraction correction. Exclusion criteria of control were the same as those of AC group. As for parents, the questionnaire was intended for the primary caregiver (i.e., the caregiver that spends more time with the child). In case of equal parenting, either parent could be enroled. The exclusion criteria for parents of AC and normal control were a history of mental or sleep disorders or ocular and systemic diseases, and the recent experience of any major life-altering events. Participants in AC group were subdivided into VKC/AKC and SAC/ PAC subgroups due to the different underlying mechanisms. We enroled 80 children with AC and their parents and 85 healthy children and their parents who met the inclusion criteria, 7 children and their parents in the AC group and 4 children and their parents in the normal control refused to participate for time reason. The statistical analysis was performed for the remaining 73 children with AC and 81 healthy children and their parents (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Flowchart showing enrolment, intervention, and analysis.

Ophthalmic Examination

A complete medical and ophthalmic history was collected from all participants. Children received slit-lamp examination, refraction and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) examination in both eyes. Conjunctival hyperaemia, papillary and follicle formation [17], corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) [27] and corneal pathologies [28] were graded as reported.

Sleep quality assessment

Chinese version of Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) of which the reliability and validity have been proven in Chinese population [10, 14, 2932] were used to assess the sleep quality for children and their parents respectively in the present study. (Supplementary Files 1 and 2).

The CSHQ scale is originally designed for children aged between 4 and 12, which includes 33-item parent-reported questionnaire in 8 components: bedtime resistance, sleep onset delay, sleep duration, sleep anxiety, night waking, parasomnia, sleep-disordered breathing, and daytime sleepiness. The total score is the sum of the scores of the 33 items [33]. The PSQI has 18 items in 7 components, including subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction [34]. The higher score of CSHQ and PSQI indicates worse sleep quality. A total score of CSHQ ≥ 41 [33, 35, 36] and PSQI > 7 [34, 37] was considered as poor sleep quality in children and adults, respectively.

Statistical analysis

In view of retrospective data from Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, the sample size was calculated based on the primary outcome, the Children’s CSHQ total score. Assuming the mean CSHQ scores of 45 in AC group, and 40 in healthy group with a common SD (standard deviation) of 10, a sample size of 73 children for each group was needed which will achieve 85% power, at a two-sided significance level of α = 0.05, using two-sample independent t test. The sample size was calculated using PASS, version 16.0 (NCSS Statistical Software).

For efficacy variables collected, only the data from the “worse” eye were included in the analyses. The “worse” eye was defined as the eye with the worse keratitis grade. If both eyes were comparable, the right eye was chosen. The normality of the continuous data was checked by Shapiro–Wilk normality test and histogram. We applied descriptive statistics throughout, reporting means and standard deviations (SDs) for normally distributed data or medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) for data not normally distributed. BCVA was converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) for analysis. The spherical equivalent (SE) of the refractive error was calculated as the spherical value plus half of the cylindrical (astigmatic) value. We compared the differences between the two groups by using independent samples t-test or rank-sum test. The homogeneity of variance was tested for two-sample t test. Univariable and multivariable liner regression for continuous sleep quality outcomes, and logistic regression model for binary outcomes were fitted to identify risk factors that were associated with influencing sleep quality scores/ poor sleep quality at enrolment. Because the data were unevenly distributed, in the univariable and multivariable analyses, we re-coded papillae, keratitis, bulbar conjunctival hyperaemia, etc., dichotomous variables based on the occurrent. As a small number of physiological follicles may appear in normal children’s lower eyelids, 0-mild was defined as normal and recorded as 0. In contrast, moderate-severe was defined as abnormal and recorded as one during re-coding. Because bulbar conjunctival congestion had a collinear relationship with palpebral conjunctival papillae and follicles and papillae had a collinear relationship with keratitis, multivariable linear regression, and logistic regression were not performed. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software V.25.0, with p < 0.05 being considered significant.

Results

Participants

A total of 73 children with AC and 81 healthy children were enroled with their parents. Geographic and clinical details are shown in Table 1. The ages were matched between two groups (children: 8.45 ± 2.15 vs. 8.59 ± 2.21 years, p = 0.690, parents: 36.6 ± 4.68 vs. 36.6 ± 5.44 years, p = 0.892). Male was more prevalent in the children in AC group than that in the control (61 [83.6%] of 73 vs. 32 [39.5%] of 81, p < 0.001). Sex and education background were matched in parents in the two groups. The AC group included 47 children diagnosed as PAC/SAC and 26 children diagnosed as VKC/AKC.

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical features of children and their parents.

AC group Control group P
(N = 73) (N = 81)
Demographics
Children
 Male sex, n (%) 61 (83.6%) 32 (39.5%)a <0.0001b
 Age (years), Mean (SD) 8.45 (2.15) 8.59 (2.21) 0.690c
 Disease duration (months), Median (IQR) 12.0 (6.00–30.0)
Previous treatment, n (%) 52 (71.2%)
Parents
 Gender (Male), n (%) 24 (32.9%) 16 (19.8%) 0.069b
 Age (years), Mean (SD) 36.6(4.68) 36.6 (5.44) 0.892c
 Education background, n (%) 0.333a
  ≤high school 32 (43.8%) 26 (32.1%)
  ≥Junior college 41 (56.2%) 55 (67.9%)
Clinical features of children
 BCVA, logMar, Mean (SD) −0.07 (0.08) −0.06 (0.07) 0.061d
 SE, Mean (SD) −0.51 (1.53) −0.70 (1.45) 0.432c
 Bulbar conjunctiva hyperaemia, n (%) <0.001a
  None 78 (96.3%) 11 (15.1%)
  Mild 3 (3.7%) 44 (60.3%)
  Moderate 0 11 (15.0%)
  Severe 0 7 (9.6%)
 Follicle <0.001a
  None 64 (79.0%) 11 (15.1%)
  Mild 17 (21.0%) 30 (41.1%)
  Moderate 0 22 (30.1%)
  Severe 0 10 (13.7%)
 Papillae <0.001a
  None 81 (100%) 11 (15.07%)
  Mild 0 37 (50.68%)
  Moderate 0 15 (20.55%)
  Severe 0 10 (13.70%)
 Keratitis grading <0.001a
  Grade 0 81 (100%) 48 (65.75%)
  Grade 1 0 21 (28.77%)
  Grade 2 0 4 (5.48%)

AC allergic conjunctivitis, BCVA best correct visual acuity, SE mean dioptric spherical equivalent, SD standard deviation, IQR interquartile range.

aFisher’s exact test.

bPearson’s chi-squared test.

ct test.

dMann–Whitney U test.

The mean BCVA and the median SE were comparable in the two groups (Table 1). The median (IQR) disease duration was 12.00 (6.00, 30.0) months, and 52 (71.2%) of 73 AC children had been treated previously. Detailed ocular signs are shown in Table 1.

Sleep quality

As shown in Table 2, children and their parents in the AC group had significantly reduced sleep quality than those in the control (CSHQ: 48.3 ± 6.55 vs. 38.8 ± 4.63, p < 0.001; PSQI: 5.62 ± 2.12 vs. 3.40 ± 1.90, p < 0.001). We further analysed and compared sleep quality scores between different AC subtypes but did not find significant difference between those with VKC/AKC and PAC/SAC in both children and parents.

Table 2.

Sleep quality of children and their parents.

All AC group
AC group Control group Pa PAC/SAC VKC/AKC Pb
(N = 73) (N = 81) (N = 47) (N = 26)
Children
  Total sleep time (hours), Mean (SD) 8.58 (1.63) 8.65 (7.93) 0.704c 8.55 (1.45) 8.62 (1.94) 0.861c
  Total score of CSHQ, Mean (SD) 48.3 (6.55) 38.8 (4.63) <0.001c 47.9 (6.48) 49.0 (1.32) 0.501c
  Components of CSHQ, Median (IQR)
   Bedtime resistance 9.00 (7.00–12.0) 6.00 (6.00–8.00) <0.001d 9.00 (7.00–13.0) 8.50 (7.00–12.0) 0.931d
   Sleep onset delay 1.00 (1.00–2.00) 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.001d 1.00 (1.00–2.00) 1.50 (1.00–3.00) 0.219d
   Sleep duration 4.00 (4.00–6.00) 3.00 (3.00–4.00) <0.001d 4.00 (4.00–6.00) 4.00 (3.00–5.25) 0.279d
   Sleep anxiety 3.00 (2.00–3.00) 2.00 (2.00–3.00) 0.003d 3.00 (2.00–3.00) 3.00 (2.00–3.00) 0.627d
   Night wakings 3.00 (2.00–5.00) 3.00 (2.00–3.00) 0.216d 3.00 (2.00–4.00) 3.00 (2.00–4.00) 0.493d
   Parasomnias 9.00 (9.00–10.0) 7.00 (7.00-8.00) <0.001d 9.00 (9.00-11.0) 10.0 (9.00–11.0) 0.424d
   Sleep-disordered breathing 3.00 (3.00–4.00) 3.00 (3.00–3.00) 0.025d 3.00 (3.00–4.00) 3.00 (3.00–4.00) 0.579d
   Daytime sleepiness 13.0 (10.0–16.0) 10.0 (8.00-12.0) <0.001d 13.0 (10.0–15.0) 14.0 (12.0–17.0) 0.129d
  Sleep disturbances (CSHQ score≥41), n (%) 65 (89.0%) 19 (23.5%) <0.001e 42 (89.4%) 23 (88.5%) 0.906e
Parents
  Total sleep time (hours), Mean (SD) 7.01 (0.84) 7.01 (0.98) 0.553a 7.05 (0.77) 6.93 (0.96) 0.567c
  Total CPSQI score, Mean (SD) 5.62 (2.12) 3.40 (1.90) <0.001a 5.30 (1.78) 6.20 (2.56) 0.084c
  Components of CPSQI, Median (IQR)
   Subjective sleep quality 0.00 (0.00–1.00) 1.00 (0.00–1.00) 0.067b 1.00 (0.00–1.00) 1.00 (1.00–2.00) 0.027d
   Sleep latency 1.00 (1.00–2.00) 1.00 (0.00–1.00) 0.025b 1.00 (0.50-2.00) 1.00 (1.00–2.00) 0.096d
   Sleep duration 1.00 (0.00–1.00) 1.00 (0.00–1.00) 0.819b 1.00 (0.00–1.00) 1.00 (0.00–1.00) 0.764d
   Habitual sleep efficiency 0.00 (0.00-0.00) 0.00 (0.00-0.00) 0.855b 0.00 (0.00–0.00) 0.00 (0.00-0.00) 0.006d
   Sleep disturbance 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.00 (0.00–1.00) <0.001b 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.676d
   Sleep medication use 1.00 (1.00–2.00) 1.00 (0.00–1.00) <0.001b 0.00 (1.00–2.00) 1.00 (0.00–2.00) 0.220d
   Daytime dysfunction 1.00 (0.00–2.00) 0.00 (0.00-0.00) <0.001b 1.00 (1.00–2.00) 2.00 (1.00–2.00) 0.154d
  Sleep dysfunction, n (%) (CPSQI score>7) 15 (18.52%) 1 (1.23%) <0.001f 6 (12.77%) 9 (39.13%) 0.027f

AC allergic conjunctivitis, PAC perennial allergic conjunctivitis, SAC seasonal allergic conjunctivitis, VKC vernal keratoconjunctivitis, AKC atopic keratoconjunctivitis, CSHQ Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire, PSQI Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, SD standard deviation, IQR interquartile range.

aAC vs. control.

bPAC/SAC vs. VKC/AKC.

ct test.

dMann–Whitney U test.

ePearson’s chi-squared test.

fFisher’s exact test.

Children with AC and their parents had significant higher prevalence of poor sleep quality (children: 65 of 73 [89.0%] vs.19 of 81 [23.5%]; parents: 15 of 73 [18.5%] vs. 1 of 81 [1.23%], both p < 0.001) when compared to the control. Nearly 90% of children had poor sleep quality in both PAC/SAC (42 of 47 [89.4%]) and VKC/AKC (23 of 26 [88.5%]) subgroups and such difference was not significant. However, parents in VKC/AKC subgroup had significant higher prevalence of poor sleep quality than those in PAC/SAC subgroup (9 of 26 [39.1%] vs. 6 of 47 [12.8%], p = 0.027).

The components of CSHQ for children were further compared (Table 2). Children with AC had significant higher scores for bedtime resistance (9.00; IQR, 7.00–12.0 vs. 6.00; IQR, 6.00–8.00; p < 0.001), sleep onset delay (1.00; IQR, 1.00–2.00 vs. 1.00; IQR, 1.00–1.00; p = 0.001), sleep duration (4.00; IQR, 4.00–6.00 vs. 3.00; IQR, 3.00–4.00; p < 0.001), parasomnia(9.00; IQR, 9.00–10.0 vs. 7.00; IQR, 7.00–8.00; p < 0.001), sleep-disordered breathing(3.00; IQR, 3.00–4.00 vs. 3.00; IQR, 3.00–3.00; p = 0.025), sleep anxiety(3.00; IQR, 2.00–3.00 vs. 2.00; IQR, 2.00–3.00; p = 0.003) and daytime sleepiness(13.0; IQR, 10.0-16.0 vs. 10.0; IQR, 8.00–12.0; p < 0.001) than children in the control, while there was no statistically significant difference in night wakings (3.00; IQR, 2.00–5.00 vs. 3.00; IQR, 2.00–3.00; p = 0.216). The increase in daytime sleepiness was most dominant.

The components of PSQI for parents were further compared as well (Table 2). Parents in the AC group had significantly higher scores for sleep latency (1.00; IQR, 1.00–2.00 vs. 1.00; IQR, 0.00–1.00; p = 0.025), use of sleeping medication (1.00; IQR, 1.00–2.00 vs. 1.00; IQR, 0.00–1.00; p < 0.001), and daytime sleepiness (1.00; IQR, 0.00–2.00 vs. 0.00; IQR, 0.00–0.00; p < 0.001) than those in normal control, while subjective sleep quality (0.00; IQR, 0.00–1.00 vs. 1.00; IQR, 0.00–1.00; p = 0.067), sleep duration (1.00; IQR, 0.00–1.00 vs. 1.00; IQR, 0.00–1.00; p = 0.819), and sleep efficiency (0.00; IQR, 0.00–0.00 vs. 0.00; IQR, 0.00–0.00; p = 0.855) were not significantly different. The increase in daytime dysfunction was most dominant.

Risk factors related to sleep quality

As shown in Table 3, reduced sleep quality score in children was correlated with sex, bulbar conjunctival hyperaemia, palpebral conjunctival papillae, follicles, and keratitis (all p < 0.001) by univariable regression analysis; while was correlated with palpebral conjunctival papillae (β:5.12; 95% CI: 2.70–7.54, p < 0.001), follicles (β:3.14; 95% CI: 0.96–5.32, p = 0.005), and keratitis (β:3.09; 95% CI: 0.17–6.01, p = 0.038) by multivariable linear regression. Bivariable logistic regression analysis showed that poor sleep quality in children was associated with follicles (OR:3.95; 95% CI: 1.88–8.31, p < 0.001) and keratitis (OR:6.03; 95% CI: 1.29–28.3, p = 0.028).

Table 3.

Regression analysis of potential risk factors of sleep disturbance and sleep dysfunction caused by allergic conjunctivitis among children.

CSHQ for children (n = 154) - linear regression CSHQ for children (n = 154) - logistic regression
Univariable Multivariable Univariable Multivariable
β (95% CI) P β (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
Children’s sex 4.65 (2.37, 6.94) <0.001 1.25 (−0.85, 3.36) 0.241 4.00 (2.02, 7.93) <0.001 2.49 (1.17, 5.30) 0.017
Children’s age −0.31 (−0.85, 0.23) 0.259 0.93 (0.80, 1.08) 0.326
Parents’ age
SE 0.39 (−0.40, 1.18) 0.332 1.04 (0.84, 1.29) 0.693
BCVA, LogMar −5.32 (−28.8, 18.1) 0.655 0.01 (0.00, 9.64) 0.175
Bulbar conjunctiva hyperemia
 No Ref Ref
 Yes 7.65 (5.64, 9.65) <0.001 14.5 (6.56, 32.1) <0.001
Papillae
  No Ref Ref Ref
  Yes 8.16 (6.12, 10.2) <0.001 5.12 (2.70, 7.54) <0.001 18.2 (7.08, 47.0) <0.001
Follicle
  No Ref Ref Ref
  Yes 6.57 (4.47, 8.68) <0.001 3.14 (0.96, 5.32) 0.005 5.90 (2.94, 11.9) <0.001 3.95 (1.88, 8.31) <0.001
Keratitis
  No Ref Ref Ref Ref
  Yes 7.98 (5.06, 10.9) <0.001 3.09 (0.17, 6.01) 0.038 5.67 (1.21, 25.6) 0.001 6.03 (1.29, 28.3) 0.028

Variables with P < 0.10 in the univariable regression analysis were included in the multivariable regression analysis. Bulbar conjunctival was not included in the multivariate regression due to collinearity with hyperaemia, papillae and follicle. The papillae was excluded in the multivariable logistic regression due to collinearity with keratitis.

SE mean dioptric spherical equivalent, BCVA best correct visual acuity, CSHQ Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval.

As for parents (Table 4), parental sleep quality score was correlated with the sleep quality of their children’, and with palpebral conjunctival papillae, follicles, and keratitis in children in univariable regression (all p < 0.001); while with decreased best-corrected visual acuity (β:7.13, 95% CI: 0.31–14.0, p = 0.041), follicles (β:1.16; 95% CI: 0.43–1.90, p = 0.002), and keratitis (β:1.48; 95% CI: 0.49–2.47, p = 0.004) in children in multivariable linear regression. Bivariable logistic regression analysis showed that parental poor sleep quality was associated with follicles (OR:7.14; 95% CI: 2.06 to 24.8, p = 0.002) and keratitis (OR:4.49; 95% CI: 1.27–15.9, p = 0.020) in children.

Table 4.

Multiple regression analysis of potential risk factors of sleep disturbance and sleep dysfunction among parents.

PSQI for parents (n = 154) - linear regression PSQI for parents (n = 154) - logistic regression
Univariable Multivariable Univariable Multivariable
Variables β (95% CI) P β (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
Children’s sex 0.70 (−0.03, 1.44) 0.063 0.11 (−0.62, 0.84) 0.763 3.14 (0.86, 11.5) 0.084 1.38 (0.32, 6.06) 0.668
Children’s age 0.07 (_0.10, 0.24) 0.434 1.24 (0.96, 1.61) 0.103
Parents’ age 0.06 (−0.01, 0.13) 0.117 1.03 (0.92, 1.15) 0.593
SE 0.05 (−0.19, 0.30) 0.665 0.91 (0.64, 1.30) 0.595
BCVA, LogMar 6.37 (−0.92, 13.7) 0.086 7.13 (0.31, 14.0) 0.041 0.43 (0.17, 13.8) 0.822
Bulbar conjunctiva hyperaemia
  No Ref Ref
  Yes 1.82 (1.15, 2.49) <0.001 8.84 (1.93, 40.4) 0.005
Papillae
  No Ref Ref
  Yes 1.76 (1.07, 2.46) <0.001 4.13 (1.35, 12.6) 0.013
Follicle
  No Ref Ref Ref Ref
  Yes 1.41 (0.71, 2.10) <0.001 1.16 (0.43, 1.90) 0.002 12.3 (3.86, 38.9) <0.001 7.14 (2.06, 24.8) 0.002
Keratitis
  No Ref Ref Ref Ref
  Yes 2.13 (1.20, 3.06) <0.001 1.48 (0.49, 2.47) 0.004 9.84 (3.21, 30.0) <0.001 4.49 (1.27, 15.9) 0.020

Variables with P < 0.10 in the univariable regression analysis were included in the multivariable regression analysis. Bulbar conjunctival was not included in the multivariate regression due to collinearity with hyperaemia, papillae and follicle. The papillae was excluded in the multivariable logistic regression due to collinearity with keratitis.

SE mean dioptric spherical equivalent, BCVA best correct visual acuity, PSQI Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval.

Discussion

Poor sleep quality is an indicator that allergic disease is in poor control and has particular relevance for a patient’s daytime functioning and overall quality of life [38]. In previous studies, sleep disturbance affects up to 60% of children with allergic dermatitis, increasing to 83% during exacerbation, which might be related to nocturnal itching [39, 40]. As for paediatric allergic rhinitis, sleep problems was detected in 40%-88% of children [38, 4144]. As one of the common allergic diseases, the potential effect of AC on children’s quality of life has been underestimated. The results of our most recent study disclose an association between AC and impaired health-related quality of life for children and their parents [45]. In present study, we excluded children with other active allergic conditions such as allergic rhinitis and allergic dermatitis to avoid the potential negative impact of these conditions on sleep quality.

The results of our study showed that sleep quality in children patient and their parents were generally significantly impaired. The prevalence of poor sleep quality in AC children was 89%, which seems to be comparable or even higher than those reported in allergic rhinitis [38, 4144] and allergic dermatitis [39, 40]. It may be inappropriate to compare these results directly because of the different diseases severity and cultural differences. Sleep quality was reduced in all components of sleep except for the night wakings in our children patient. Children with AC had shorter sleep duration, more difficulty in falling asleep, and more other sleep disorders such as being anxiety or afraid of sleeping alone, etc. and therefore more daytime sleepiness.

It is noteworthy that impaired sleep quality was evident even in children with PAC/SAC which are considered as common but relatively mild types of the disease. Mean sleep quality score in both PAC/SAC and VKC/AKC subgroups were higher than 41 indicating the presence of poor sleep quality was common, no matter in mild or severe types of AC. Indeed, the prevalence of poor sleep quality was both high as 89.4% in PAC/SAC and 88.5% in VKC/AKC subgroups. Taken together, our study suggests that although AC is an overall none-blinding topical eye disease, its potential effect on children’s sleep quality should not be ignored.

We speculated that nocturnal itching may be responsible for such sleep impairment. However, no symptomatic questionnaire or scales for AC is available, so the association between decline in sleep quality and the symptom severity and time could not be established. Nonetheless, our results revealed that decreased sleep quality in children did being associated with the occurrence of more clinical signs including palpebral conjunctival papillae, follicles, and keratitis in patients which generally link to more discomfort. Another plausible mechanism is circadian fluctuation of inflammatory mediators such as an increase in nocturnal inflammation [46, 47]. Histamine, an inflammatory mediator released during allergic reactions, might contribute to disturbed sleep because it is involved in the regulation of the sleep-wake cycle and arousal but also can induce symptoms of conjunctivitis, directly leading to sleep disruption [48].

Antihistamines and/or glucocorticoids, which are often used in treating allergic rhinitis and allergic dermatitis, have a side-effect of affecting sleep [49, 50]. This is also a great concern of doctors in drug use of treating allergic diseases. In our study, we found that children with allergic conjunctivitis, without using systemic antihistamines or glucocorticoids, also had a decreased sleep quality, indicating that the disease itself had a negative impact on sleep quality.

Changes in children’s sleep would potentially affect the sleep of other family members. The impact of chronic illness on caregivers is a core issue when managing paediatric patients. Similar to the results in children, overall sleep quality and sleep latency, sleep disturbances, sleep medication use and daytime dysfunction were all significantly worse in parents of children with AC, although the prevalence of poor sleep quality in parents was much lower as 18.5% than 89% in their children with AC. Such prevalence significantly increased to 39.1% in patients of children with more severe AC as VKC/AKC. Again, similar to results in children, the decreased sleep quality in parents was found to be linked to a decreased vision and more clinical signs as papillae and keratitis in children. The worries or concerns of the disease especially in those cases with worse visual function and more eye pathologies, as well as taking care of the children with more sleep problem contributed to the sleep problem in parents.

Our study has some limitations. Firstly, we didn’t investigate whether the most intense itching experienced by the majority of patients occurred at night or during sleep. Secondly, our data were collected from subjective questionnaires instead of objective monitoring or assessment of sleep quality. Thirdly, all the patients were recruited from cornea department in a referral ophthalmic centre. More severe cases were rerolled and subsequently generated selection bias.

Conclusion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the status of sleep quality in children with AC and their parents. The results of our study indicate that AC potentially impairs sleep quality and further daytime functioning in both children and their parents. Such impact was common and evident in children especially in those with more clinal signs as severe follicle formation and keratitis. It should be noted that causal relationship between AC and reduced sleep quality can’t be established by the current observational study. Further studies to investigate whether anti-allergic therapy may improve sleep quality in AC is warranted. It would be interesting to know whether administration right before sleep can improve children’s sleep quality.

Supplementary information is available at Eye’s website.

Summary

What was known before

  • AC has a negative association with quality of life for children and their parents.

  • A variety of chronic eye diseases including dry eye disease, glaucoma, have been found to potentially correlated with sleep disorders which can in turn exacerbate the condition, creating a vicious cycle.

  • For children, currently the association between eye diseases and sleep quality has been reported only in myopia with reduced sleep quality.

What this study adds

  • AC potentially impairs sleep quality and further daytime functioning in both children and their parents. especially in those with more severe clinal signs as follicle formation and keratitis.

  • Although AC is an overall none-blinding topical eye disease, its potential effect on children’s and their parents’ sleep quality should not be ignored.

Supplementary information

Supplementary File 1 (544.3KB, pdf)
Supplementary File 2 (149.6KB, pdf)

Author contributions

LL conceived the study; JL, and SZ initially designed the study, analysed data, and prepared the manuscript; ZF, and RL collected clinical samples; LJ contributed to data visualisation. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study is supported by grants (82070922) from the National Natural Science Foundation of China, a grant (2019A1515012012) from the Science Foundation of Guangdong Province and a grant (303020101) from the High-level Hospital Construction Project.

Data availability

Data are available upon reasonable request from the authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Jing Li, Shi-yao Zhang.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41433-022-02182-4.

References

  • 1.Guallar-Castillon P, Bayan-Bravo A, Leon-Munoz LM, Balboa-Castillo T, Lopez-Garcia E, Gutierrez-Fisac JL, et al. The association of major patterns of physical activity, sedentary behavior and sleep with health-related quality of life: a cohort study. Prev Med. 2014;67:248–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Laugsand LE, Strand LB, Vatten LJ, Janszky I, Bjorngaard JH. Insomnia symptoms and risk for unintentional fatal injuries-the HUNT Study. Sleep. 2014;37:1777–86. doi: 10.5665/sleep.4170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hiscock H, Sciberras E, Mensah F, Gerner B, Efron D, Khano S, et al. Impact of a behavioural sleep intervention on symptoms and sleep in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and parental mental health: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2015;350:h68. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fatima Y, Doi SA, Mamun AA. Sleep quality and obesity in young subjects: a meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2016;17:1154–66. doi: 10.1111/obr.12444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Matricciani L, Paquet C, Galland B, Short M, Olds T. Children’s sleep and health: a meta-review. Sleep Med Rev. 2019;46:136–50. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2019.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gonzalez-Nunez V, Valero AL, Mullol J. Impact of sleep as a specific marker of quality of life in allergic rhinitis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2013;13:131–41. doi: 10.1007/s11882-012-0330-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kerkhof GA. Epidemiology of sleep and sleep disorders in The Netherlands. Sleep Med. 2017;30:229–39. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2016.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Luca A, Luca M, Calandra C. Sleep disorders and depression: brief review of the literature, case report, and nonpharmacologic interventions for depression. Clin Inter Aging. 2013;8:1033–9. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S47230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Koren D, Dumin M, Gozal D. Role of sleep quality in the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2016;9:281–310. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S95120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yu X, Guo H, Liu X, Wang G, Min Y, Chen SS, et al. Dry eye and sleep quality: a large community-based study in Hangzhou. Sleep. 2019;42:196. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsz160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chang PP, Ford DE, Mead LA, Cooper-Patrick L, Klag MJ. Insomnia in young men and subsequent depression. The Johns Hopkins Precursors Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;146:105–14. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kaneita Y, Ohida T, Uchiyama M, Takemura S, Kawahara K, Yokoyama E, et al. The relationship between depression and sleep disturbances: a Japanese nationwide general population survey. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67:196–203. doi: 10.4088/JCP.v67n0204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ayaki M, Torii H, Tsubota K, Negishi K. Decreased sleep quality in high myopia children. Sci Rep. 2016;6:33902. doi: 10.1038/srep33902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhou Z, Morgan IG, Chen Q, Jin L, He M, Congdon N. Disordered sleep and myopia risk among Chinese children. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0121796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ostrin LA, Read SA, Vincent SJ, Collins MJ. Sleep in myopic and non-myopic children. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020;9:22. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.9.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bielory BP, O’Brien TP, Bielory L. Management of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis: guide to therapy. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90:399–407. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02272.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Takamura E, Uchio E, Ebihara N, Ohno S, Ohashi Y, Okamoto S, et al. Japanese guidelines for allergic conjunctival diseases 2017. Allergol Int. 2017;66:220–9. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2016.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Patel DS, Arunakirinathan M, Stuart A, Angunawela R. Allergic eye disease. BMJ. 2017;359:j4706. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Leonardi A, Castegnaro A, Valerio AL, Lazzarini D. Epidemiology of allergic conjunctivitis: clinical appearance and treatment patterns in a population-based study. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;15:482–8. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lee TH. Allergy: the unmet need. Clin Med. 2003;3:303–5. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.3-4-303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Azari AA, Barney NP. Conjunctivitis: a systematic review of diagnosis and treatment. JAMA. 2013;310:1721–9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.280318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Miyazaki D, Takamura E, Uchio E, Ebihara N, Ohno S, Ohashi Y, et al. Japanese guidelines for allergic conjunctival diseases 2020. Allergol Int. 2020;69:346–55. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2020.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Elieh Ali Komi D, Rambasek T, Bielory L. Clinical implications of mast cell involvement in allergic conjunctivitis. Allergy. 2018;73:528–39. doi: 10.1111/all.13334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Thong BY. Allergic conjunctivitis in Asia. Asia Pac Allergy. 2017;7:57–64. doi: 10.5415/apallergy.2017.7.2.57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Varu DM, Rhee MK, Akpek EK, Amescua G, Farid M, Garcia-Ferrer FJ, et al. Conjunctivitis preferred practice pattern(R) Ophthalmology. 2019;126:P94–P169. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.10.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Majani G, Baiardini I, Giardini A, Pasquali M, Tiozzo M, Tosca M, et al. Impact of children’s respiratory allergies on caregivers. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2005;63:199–203. doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2005.621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lemp MA. Report of the National Eye Institute/Industry workshop on Clinical Trials in Dry Eyes. CLAO J. 1995;21:221–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Liang L, Liu Y, Ding X, Ke H, Chen C, Tseng SCG. Significant correlation between meibomian gland dysfunction and keratitis in young patients with Demodex brevis infestation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102:1098–102. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wu R, Wang GH, Zhu H, Jiang F, Jiang CL. Sleep patterns in chinese preschool children: a population-based study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2018;14:533–40. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Qi J, Xu J, Li BZ, Huang JS, Yang Y, Zhang ZT, et al. The evaluation of sleep disturbances for Chinese frontline medical workers under the outbreak of COVID-19. Sleep Med. 2020;72:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2020.05.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tsai PS, Wang SY, Wang MY, Su CT, Yang TT, Huang CJ, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (CPSQI) in primary insomnia and control subjects. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:1943–52. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-4346-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tsai SY, Lee WT, Lee CC, Jeng SF, Weng WC. Sleep in children with epilepsy: the role of maternal knowledge of childhood sleep. Sleep. 2018;41:zsy157. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsy157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Owens JA, Spirito A, McGuinn M. The Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ): psychometric properties of a survey instrument for school-aged children. Sleep. 2000;23:1043–51. doi: 10.1093/sleep/23.8.1d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989;28:193–213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Malhi P, Kaur A, Singhi P, Sankhyan N. Sleep dysfunction and behavioral daytime problems in children with autism spectrum disorders: a comparative study. Indian J Pediatr. 2019;86:12–7. doi: 10.1007/s12098-018-2731-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Goodlin-Jones BL, Sitnick SL, Tang K, Liu J, Anders TF. The Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire in toddlers and preschool children. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2008;29:82–8. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e318163c39a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ayaki M, Kawashima M, Negishi K, Kishimoto T, Mimura M, Tsubota K. Sleep and mood disorders in dry eye disease and allied irritating ocular diseases. Sci Rep. 2016;6:22480. doi: 10.1038/srep22480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Koinis-Mitchell D, Craig T, Esteban CA, Klein RB. Sleep and allergic disease: a summary of the literature and future directions for research. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;130:1275–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.06.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Reid P, Lewis-Jones MS. Sleep difficulties and their management in preschoolers with atopic eczema. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1995;20:38–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.1995.tb01280.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Daud LR, Garralda ME, David TJ. Psychosocial adjustment in preschool children with atopic eczema. Arch Dis Child. 1993;69:670–6. doi: 10.1136/adc.69.6.670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lei RL, Lin WC, Lin CC, Lei RW. Effects of acupressure on symptoms relief and improving sleep quality in pediatric patients with allergic rhinitis. Holist Nurs Pract. 2020;36:166–74. doi: 10.1097/HNP.0000000000000377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Meltzer EO, Blaiss MS, Derebery MJ, Mahr TA, Gordon BR, Sheth KK, et al. Burden of allergic rhinitis: results from the Pediatric Allergies in America survey. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;124:S43–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Dolovich J. Assessment of quality of life in adolescents with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: development and testing of a questionnaire for clinical trials. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1994;93:413–23. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(94)90349-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Urrutia-Pereira M, Sole D, Chong Neto HJ, Acosta V, Cepeda AM, Alvarez-Castello M, et al. Sleep disorders in Latin-American children with asthma and/or allergic rhinitis and normal controls. Allergol Immunopathol. 2017;45:145–51. doi: 10.1016/j.aller.2016.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhang SY, Li J, Liu R, Lao HY, Fan Z, Jin L, et al. Association of allergic conjunctivitis with health-related quality of life in children and their parents. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021;139:830–7. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.1708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Martin RJ, Banks-Schlegel S. Chronobiology of asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158:1002–7. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.3.9712132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kelsay K. Management of sleep disturbance associated with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;118:198–201. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.04.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hildreth TA, Stewart W, Cass AS. Congenital megacalyces associated with Hirschsprung’s disease. Urology. 1976;7:187–9. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(76)90309-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ozdemir PG, Karadag AS, Selvi Y, Boysan M, Bilgili SG, Aydin A, et al. Assessment of the effects of antihistamine drugs on mood, sleep quality, sleepiness, and dream anxiety. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2014;18:161–8. doi: 10.3109/13651501.2014.907919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Colas C, Galera H, Anibarro B, Soler R, Navarro A, Jauregui I, et al. Disease severity impairs sleep quality in allergic rhinitis (The SOMNIAAR study) Clin Exp Allergy. 2012;42:1080–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03935.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File 1 (544.3KB, pdf)
Supplementary File 2 (149.6KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon reasonable request from the authors.


Articles from Eye are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES