Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 20;33(2):405–414. doi: 10.1007/s00062-022-01221-7

Table 1.

Summary of studies included in the systematic review and meta-analysis

Author Year Country Design Patients with iPCAO (n) Occlusion site (n) Endovascular treatment Only best medical treatment
Patients (n) Age (years) Sex (M/F) Baseline NIHSS IVT Endovascular treatment method Patients
(n)
Age (years) Sex (M/F) Baseline NIHSS IVT
Brouwer et al. [9] 2022 Netherlands Multicenter prospective cohort 20 P1 (n = 17), P2 (n = 2), P3 (n = 1) 20 72 (±4.5) 7/13 13 (5–21) 12 (60%) Stent retriever; aspiration thrombectomy; intra-arterial thrombolysis
Baik et al. [10] 2022 Republic of Korea Multicenter retrospective cohort 48 P1 (n = 17), P2 (n = 31) 48 69.6 (±15.9) 34/14 9 (6–14) 18 (37.5%) Stent-retriever; aspiration thrombectomy; intra-arterial thrombolysis
Fischer et al. [11] 2022 Germany Multicenter retrospective cohort 8 P2 (n = 8) 8 NR NR NR NR Stent retriever
Baig et al. [12] 2021 USA Single-center retrospective cohort 21 P1 (n = 13), P2 (n = 8) 21 71.2 (±10.2) 9/12 9 (5–15) 10 (47.6%) Stent-retriever; aspiration thrombectomy
Cunha et al. [13] 2021 Portugal Single-center retrospective cohort 38 P1 (n = 19), P2 (n = 16), P3 (n = 3) 25

79.3

(±2.4)

16/9

10

(6.0–14.5)

14 (56%) Stent retriever; aspiration thrombectomy; intra-arterial thrombolysis 13 75.3 (±3.93) 7/6 8 (5.5–10.0) 13 (100%)
Altenbernd et al. [14] 2021 Germany Single-center retrospective cohort 79 P1 (n = 60), P2 (n = 19) 79 72.8 (±11.6) 35/44 12 (4–15) 43 (54%) Stent retriever; aspiration thrombectomy
Herweh et al. [15] 2021 Germany, USA, Taiwan Multicenter retrospective cohort 130 P1 (n = 62), distal to P1 (n = 68) 23 70 (±13.3) 14/9 9 (1–20)a 5 (22%) Mechanical thrombectomy 107 74 (±13.1) 56/51 7 (1–38)a 44 (41%)
Meyer et al. [16] 2021 Germany, France, USA, Singapore, Sweden, Spain, Switzerland Multicenter case-control study 243 P2 (n = 199), P3 (n = 44) 143 72.66 (±14.1) 79/64 7 (4–11) 57 (40%) Stent retriever; aspiration thrombectomy; intra-arterial thrombolysis 92 72.2 (±14.3) 42/50 5 (2–10) 53 (58%)
Miszczuk et al. [17] 2021 Germany Multicenter retrospective cohort 17 P2 (n = 14), P3 (n = 3) 17 74 (58–81) NR 10 (5–14) 8 (47%) Stent retriever; aspiration thrombectomy
Clarençon et al. [18] 2020 France, Switzerland, USA, Czech Republic, Spain Multicenter retrospective cohort 22 P1 (n = 17), P2 (n = 5) 22 66.2 (±14.3) 12/10 14 (8–16) 11 (50%) Stent retriever
Memon et al. [19] 2020 USA Single-center retrospective cohort 15 P1 (n = 12), P1/P2 junction (n = 3) 15 64 (±17) 6/9 9 (5–15) 7 (46%) Stent retriever
Strambo et al. [20] 2020 Switzerland Single-center retrospective cohort 106 P1 (n = 34), P2 (n = 72) 21

71

(64–78.2)

8/13 7 (5–8.3) 13 (62%) Stent retriever; aspiration thrombectomy; intra-arterial thrombolysis 85 76.6 (68.3–83.8) 48/37 7 (4–12) 34 (40%)
Grossberg et al. [21] 2018 USA Single-center retrospective cohort 3 NR 3 66 (±26.5) 3/0 14 (8–22) 2 (67%) Stent-retriever; aspiration thrombectomy
Premat et al. [22] 2018 France Single-center retrospective cohort 7

P1 (n = 3),

P2 (n = 2),

P3 (n = 2)

7 NR NR 7 (5–28) NR Stent-retriever; aspiration thrombectomy
Meier et al. [23] 2011 Switzerland Single-center prospective cohort 18

P1(n = 7),

P2 (n = 10),

P3 (n = 1)

9 66 (±11.6) 5/4 9 (6–16) 0 Intra-arterial thrombolysis; mechanical thrombectomy 9 58 (±16.2) 7/2 4 (3–6) 9 (100%)

Values are presented as n (%), mean (± SD) or median (IQR)

NIHSS National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, IVT intravenous thrombolysis, M male, F female, NR not reported, iPCAO isolated posterior cerebral artery occlusion

aMedian (range)