Table 1.

Performance evaluation of ChatGPT-3.5 across different subjects.

Subjects	Overall Performance	Comments
Choice of controller for smart home application	Acceptable	Outstanding choice with proper details on different types, Arduino was the leading choice, understandable discussion, usable but shallowly detailed information.
Sensor types	Partially acceptable	Type choice was proper, with inconsistencies in listing and presentation. No commercialization was apparent.
Sensor specification	Partially acceptable with minor technical errors	Specifications were mostly ok, minor problems were found in specification parameters (only one per type) and pricing. Probably due to limited availability to the internet.
Hardware interfacing	Partially acceptable	Interfacing details were almost acceptable with minor inconsistencies in presentation. The descriptions were written with varied required basic knowledge for understanding.
Code	Partially acceptable with occasional technical errors	Correct syntax, uneven commenting, minor addressing issues.
Literature	Unacceptable	Totally unacceptable for academic demands. Fabricated titles with real authors and fake, sometimes working, but not connected DOIs. Technical data is addressed in a more reliable form.