Skip to main content
. 2023 May 18;12(10):2023. doi: 10.3390/plants12102023

Table 6.

Summary of the analysis of variance for the pH—hydrogen potential, SS—soluble solids, AA—ascorbic acid, and TA—titratable acidity of pulp of sour passion fruit irrigated with saline water and salicylic acid in the first production cycle.

SV DF Mean Squares
pH SS AA TA
Electrical conductivity of water (ECw) 4 1.10 × 10−2 ** 12.91 ** 0.73 ** 6.83 **
Linear regression 1 - 48.83 ** 0.11 * 25.60 **
Quadratic regression 1 - 2.55 ns 0.04 ns 1.63 *
Residual 1 8 4.43 × 10−3 0.40 0.24 0.21
Salicylic acid (SA) 3 9.93 × 10−2 ** 5.90 ** 3.64 ** 3.49 **
Linear regression 1 0.08 * 4.13 * 2.41 ns 2.38 *
Quadratic regression 1 0.12 ** 10.88 ** 7.28 ** 6.36 **
Interaction (ECw × SA) 12 3.10 × 10−2 ** 0.04 ns 2.02 ** 0.02 ns
Residual 2 32 2.47 × 10−3 0.93 0.19 0.51
CV 1 (%) 2.73 4.44 16.76 4.37
CV 2 (%) 2.04 6.77 15.08 6.72

SV—Source of variation; DF—degree of freedom; CV (%)—coefficient of variation; * significant at 0.05 level of probability; ** significant at 0.01 level of probability; and ns—not significant.