Table 12.
Summary of the analysis of variance for the pH—hydrogen potential, SS—soluble solids, AA—ascorbic acid, and TA—titratable acidity in the pulp of sour passion fruit irrigated with saline water and salicylic acid in the second production cycle.
| SV | DF | Mean Squares | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | SS | AA | TA | ||
| Electrical conductivity of water (ECw) | 4 | 2.74 ** | 14.15 ** | 4.34 ** | 16.56 ** |
| Linear regression | 1 | 10.82 ** | 55.06 ** | 17.33 ** | 63.90 ** |
| Quadratic regression | 1 | 0.01 ns | 1.24 ns | 0.05 ns | 2.31 ns |
| Residual 1 | 8 | 1.17 × 10−4 | 0.19 | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Salicylic acid (SA) | 3 | 0.15 ns | 0.44 ns | 0.06 ns | 0.05 ns |
| Interaction (ECw × SA) | 12 | 6.64 × 10−4 ns | 0.13 ns | 0.03 ns | 0.01 ns |
| Residual 2 | 32 | 2.47 × 10−3 | 0.27 | 0.005 | 0.02 |
| CV 1 (%) | 2.40 | 3.09 | 3.40 | 3.18 | |
| CV 2 (%) | 3.88 | 3.70 | 5.02 | 4.88 | |
SV—Source of variation; DF—degree of freedom; CV (%)—coefficient of variation; ** significant at 0.01 level of probability; and ns—not significant.