Table 13.
Comparison of various reviewed papers.
S. No. | Year and Reference | Species | Techniques Used | Disease Identified | Performance Measure | Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | 2010 [2] | Sugar beet | SVM based on hyperspectral reflectance | Sugar beet rust, Cercospora leaf spot, powdery mildew | Accuracy | Higher than 86% |
2. | 2012 [35] | Grapes, Wheat | Backpropagation networks, image processing technologies | Grape (downy mildew, powdery mildew), wheat (stripe rust, leaf rust) | Accuracy (prediction accuracy, fitting accuracy) | Fitting accuracy—100% (for both), prediction accuracy—97.14% (grape), 100% (wheat) |
3. | 2012 [3] | Apple | Image processing techniques (multi-class SVM) | Apple rot, apple scab, apple blotch | Accuracy | 93% |
4. | 2013 [72] | Sugar beet | Spectral disease indices | Sugar beet rust, cercospora leaf spot, powdery mildew | Accuracy | Sugar beet rust—87%, cercospora leaf spot—92%, powdery mildew—85% |
5. | 2013 [37] | Grape | Feed-forward back propagation neural network | Powdery mildew, downy mildew | Accuracy | 100% (using the HUE feature only) |
6. | 2016 [38] | - | SVM (serial combination of two SVMs) | Thrips, Tuta absoluta, leaf miners (damaged by pest insects), early blight, powdery mildew, late blight (pathogens symptoms) | Accuracy | 87.80% |
7. | 2016 [9] | Cucumber | Convolutional neural network | KGMMV, WMV, PRSV, CMV, CCYV, ZYMV, MYSV | Accuracy | 82.3% |
8. | 2017 [41] | Tomato | Deep learning (AlexNet and SqueezeNet) | Spider mites, yellow leaf curl virus, early blight, bacterial spot, septoria leaf spot, leaf mold, late blight, mosaic virus, target spot | Accuracy | AlexNet—95.65%, SqueezeNet—94.3% |
9. | 2017 [10] | Tomato | CNN | Yellow leaf curl virus, bacterial spot, late blight, leaf mold, spider mites, septoria spot, mosaic virus, target spot, early blight | Accuracy | 99.18% |
10. | 2017 [42] | Apple | Deep convolutional neural network (AlexNet) | Rust, mosaic, alternaria leaf spot, brown spot | Accuracy | 97.62% |
11. | 2018 [61] | 25 different plant species | CNN models based on deep learning techniques | 58 distinct classes | Accuracy | 99.53% |
12. | 2018 [4] | Papaya | Random forest (RF) | Healthy/unhealthy | Accuracy | 70% |
13. | 2018 [13] | Cucumber | DCNN | Downy mildew, anthracnose, powdery mildew, and target leaf spots | Accuracy | 93.4% |
14. | 2018 [14] | Tomato | CNN with learning vector quantization | Septoria spot, bacterial spot, yellow curved, and late blight | Accuracy | 86% |
15. | 2018 [5] | Orange | SVM with K-means clustering (classification), degree of disease severity—fuzzy logic | Brown rot, citrus canker, melanoses, stubborn | Accuracy | 90% |
16. | 2019 [16] | 13 different plant leaves (grape, apple, tomato, cherry, peach, potato, and others) | Nine-layer deep CNN | Potato (early blight), cherry (powdery mildew), apple with black rot, peach with bacterial spots, tomato (leaf mold), grape (leaf blight), etc. | Accuracy | 96.46% |
17. | 2019 [62] | Apple, tomato | Convolutional neural network | Healthy/diseased | Accuracy | 87% |
18. | 2020 [20] | Grape | Convolutional neural network (UnitedModel) | Esca, black rot, isariopsis | Validation accuracy, test accuracy | test accuracy—98.57%, validation accuracy—99.17% |
19. | 2019 [70] | Cotton, tomato | Image processing techniques, neural network | Cotton (target spot, bacterial leaf spot), tomato (septoria leaf spot, leaf mold) | Accuracy | For cotton (bacterial leaf spot—90%, target spot)—80%, for tomato (septoria leaf spot and leaf mold)—100% |
20. | 2019 [17] | Cucumber | CNN with global average pooling | Black spot, powdery mildew, angular leaf spot, gray mold, anthracnose, downy mildew | Accuracy | 94.65% |
21. | 2019 [7] | Chili | SVM | Cucumber mosaic virus | Accuracy | 57.1% |
22. | 2019 [64] | Guava | Deep convolutional neural network | Rust, algal leaf spot, whitefly | Accuracy | 98.74% |
23. | 2019 [46] | Guava | Convolutional neural network | Anthracnose, fruit canker, fruit rot | Accuracy | 95.61% |
24. | 2019 [47] | Lady finger | SVM, artificial neural network | Powdery mildew, leaf spot, yellow mosaic vein | Accuracy | 85% (SVM) and 97% (ANN); without noise, 92% (SVM) and 98% (ANN) |
25. | 2019 [19] | Pearl millet | Transfer learning with feature extraction | Mildew | Accuracy, f1-score, recall, precision | Accuracy—95%, f1-score—91.75%, recall—94.50%, precision—90.50% |
26. | 2021 [24] | Soybean | CNN (GoogleNet, AlexNet) | Brown spot, frogeye leaf spot, bacterial blight | Accuracy | 98.75% (AlexNet), 96.25% (GoogleNet) |
27. | 2020 [68] | Tomato | Convolutional neural network | Septoria leaf spot, early blight, mosaic virus, yellow leaf curl virus, bacterial spot | Accuracy | 97% |
28. | 2021 [26] | 14 crops | Discount momentum deep learning optimizer | 26 disease classes | Accuracy | 97% |
29. | 2020 [51] | Mango | Feed-forward neural network (deep neural networks) | Powdery mildew, gall midge, anthracnose | Accuracy | 91.32% (training accuracy), 85.45% (testing accuracy) |
30. | 2020 [22] | Potato, tomato, bell pepper | CNN | Potato (early and late blight), bell pepper bacterial spot, tomato (target spot, mosaic virus, early blight, bacterial spot, yellow leaf curl virus, late blight, septoria leaf spot, spider mites, leaf mold) | Test Accuracy | 88.8% |
31. | 2021 [73] | Peach | Hybrid approach (convolutional autoencoder, convolutional neural network) | Bacterial spot | Accuracy | Testing accuracy—98.38%, training accuracy—99.35% |
32. | 2022 [56] | 14 crops | Deep ensemble neural network | 38 classes | Accuracy | 99.99% |
33. | 2021 [28] | Tomato | C-GAN (for producing synthetic images), DenseNet | Two-spotted spider mite, bacterial spot, septoria leaf spot, yellow leaf curl virus, target spot, early blight, leaf mold, late blight, mosaic virus | Accuracy | 99.51% (5 classes), 98.65% (7 classes), 97.11% (10 classes) |
34. | 2021 [71] | 26 plant species | LFM-CNAPS based on meta-learning | 60 diseases | Accuracy | 93.9% |
35. | 2021 [31] | Grape | CNN (VGG, DenseNet, ResNet) | Black rot, leaf blight, esca | Accuracy | 98.27% (DenseNet accuracy) |
36. | 2021 [32] | Tomato | GoogleNet, VGG16 | Bacterial spot, early blight, late blight | Accuracy | GoogleNet—99.23%, VGG16—98% |
37. | 2021 [1] | Apple | Convolutional neural networks | Bitter rot, powdery mildew, sooty blotch | Accuracy | 97% |
38. | 2022 [66] | Tomato | Optimal mobile network-Based CNN | Late blight, target spot, leaf mold, and early blight | Accuracy, recall, precision, kappa, F-score | 98.7% (accuracy), 0.9892 (recall), 0.985 (precision, F1-score, kappa) |