Skip to main content
. 2023 May 15;59(5):948. doi: 10.3390/medicina59050948

Table 3.

Randomized controlled trials on depression in heart failure. BDI-II, Beck Depression Inventory-II; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; EF, ejection fraction; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; HAM-D, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression; HF, congestive heart failure; HR, hazard ratio; MADRS, Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire-9.

Trial Inclusion Criteria Number of Patients Drug Mean Follow-Up Primary Endpoints Results
SADHART-CHF
  • -

    HF

  • -

    EF ≤ 45%

  • -

    New York Heart Association functional classification II–IV

  • -

    Clinical interview

469 Sertraline vs. placebo 12 weeks
  • -

    Mean ± SE change in HAM-D

  • -

    Composite cardiovascular status

No significant differences between groups (p = 0.78)
MOOD-HF
  • -

    HF

  • -

    EF ≤45%

  • -

    New York Heart Association functional classification II–IV

  • -

    Clinical interview and PHQ-9

372 Escitalopram 10–20 mg/day
vs. placebo
24 months
  • -

    All-cause mortality or hospitalization

  • -

    Mean MADRS score variation

No significant between-group difference (p = 0.26)
OCEAN
  • -

    HF across the EF spectrum

  • -

    New York Heart Association functional classification II–IV

  • -

    Clinical interview + HAM-D ≥ 18

108 High EPA vs.
placebo
12 weeks
  • -

    HAM-D and BDI-II

No significant between-group difference