Table 4.
Author (year)/ Country |
Objectives | Study population, sugars exposure and dental outcome | Data on dose response | Quality appraisal |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cohort Studies | ||||
Rugg-Gunn et al. (1984;1987) [107, 108] England |
Cohort study To study dietary habits and the development of dental caries over the same period (2 years) |
Children (n = 405) aged 12–15 years. Total sugars intake. DMFS increment over 2 years | Sugar intake related to fissure caries increment after adjusting for confounders. Each 30 g/day increased DMFS by 0.36 (95% CI: 0.07, 0.80) over 2-year follow up |
Quality appraised by Turuk et al. [12] using OHAT: Tier 2-Probably high RoB Quality of studies not assessed by SACN/ Moynihan and Kelly [3] |
Burt et al. (1988; 1994) [105, 111] Szpunar et al. (1995) [106] USA |
Cohort study To investigate the relationship between total sugars intake and development of dental caries over 3 years. The study also aimed to relate sugars consumption to the probability of experiencing caries increment |
Children (n =) 499 initially aged 10–15 years in Michigan USA. Living in rural non-fluoridated areas Total sugars DMFS over 3 years |
Each + 5 g sugars led to a 1% increase in the probability of developing caries over 3-year follow up Higher sugar (% EI and g/d) increased probability of caries on all surfaces but only a higher % EI from sugars significantly increased probability of pit, fissure and aproximal caries |
Quality appraised by Turuk et al. [12] using OHAT: Tier 1, probably low RoB Quality of studies not assessed by SACN/ Moynihan and Kelly [3] |
Bernabe et al. (2016) [104] Finland |
Cohort study Explored the shape of the association of frequency and amount of sugars intake with caries in adults, 2) the relative contribution of frequency and amount of sugars intake to caries levels, and 3) whether the association of frequency and amount of sugars consumption with caries varies according to exposure to fluoride |
Finish adults (n = 1702) followed up 11 years. Total sugars intake | A linear dose response relationship observed between sugars intake from 13.7 g/d (~ 2% E) to 442 g/d and caries increment. For every 10-g/d sugars intake, DMFT increased by 0.09 (95% CI: 0.02,0.15), p = 0.14 | Quality appraised by Turuk et al. [12] and Moores et al. [4] using OHAT: Tier 1, probably low RoB |
Cross sectional studies | ||||
Saw et al. (2012) [116] Malaysia |
Cross sectional study To investigate the dietary intake of adults in dental clinic and to evaluate their dental caries experience using DMFT scores. The relationship between total dietary intake and dental caries experience was also investigated |
Adults (n = 168) 20–59 years Sugars (not defined) g/day and % EI) DMFT by WHO methods |
NS correlation between sugars and DMFT index (r = 0.055, P = 0.476). Correlations assessed using Spearman’s rho correlation test and Pearson correlation test. No apparent adjustment for confounders | Quality appraised by Moores et al. [4] using OHAT: Tier 3, definitely high RoB |
Chi et al. (2015) [114] USA (Alaska) |
Cross sectional study Evaluated the feasibility of collecting hair samples from Yupik children and tested the association between the hair biomarker-based measure of added sugar intake and tooth decay |
Native Alaskan Children Added sugars assessed using biomarker of intake % carious surfaces assessed |
Age-adjusted linear regression: 40 g/day increase in added sugars intake associated with a 6.4% absolute increase in the proportion of carious tooth surfaces (95% CI: 1.2% to 11.6%; P = 0.02) Log-linear regression model: 40 g/day increase in added sugars associated with a 24.2% relative increase in the proportion of carious tooth surfaces (95% CI: 10.6% to 39.4%; P < 0.01) |
Quality appraised by Moores et al. [4] using OHAT: Tier 2, Probably high RoB |
Mitrakul et al. (2016) [117] Thailand |
Cross sectional study To examine the association between dental caries and 2 factors: BMI and diet |
Children aged 6–12 years (n = 100) Total sugars intake DMFT |
Correlation between total sugars and DMFT score: R = -0.128, P = 0.205. Graphical data show total sugars intake ranged from 0-140 g/day (reported as mg/day, but this was assumed to be g/day) | Quality appraised by Moores et al. [4] using OHAT: Tier 3, definitely high RoB |
Rosier et al. (2017) [113] Netherlands |
Cross sectional study To comprehensively describe the early stages of caries in a healthy young adult population free of cavities and the relationship with behavioural caries risk factors e.g., diet, oral hygiene |
Adults (n = 268) Total sugars % EI Enamel caries (ICDAS 1–6) |
Correlation coefficient for enamel caries and percent energy from sugars was 0.21 (P < 0.01) and for any caries was 0.19 (P < 0.01) | Quality appraised by Moores et al. [4] using OHAT: Tier 2, Probably high RoB |
Barrington et al. (2019) [112] Australia |
Cross sectional study investigating association of overweight/obesity, dental caries experience and diet in a nationally representative sample of Australian adults |
15–60 years old (n = 4170) Added sugars intake DMFT from National Survey of Adult Oral Health |
Positive association between dental caries experience (DMFT), and sugars consumption. Added sugars and total sugars were significantly associated with decayed and missing teeth in adults. Multivariate regression Added sugars • DMFT, 1.0002 (95% CI: 0.999, 1.004), P = 0.145 • D, 1.01 (95% CI: 1.00,1.02), P < 0.05 • M, 1.01 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.01), P < 0.001 • F, 0.999 (95% CI: 0.996, 1.003), P = 0.744 Total sugars • DMFT, 1.0003 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.00), P = 0.254 • D, 1.003 (95% CI: 1.001, 1.003), P < 0.001 • M, 1.001 (95% CI: 1.0004, 1.002), P < 0.05 • F, 0.999 (95% CI: 0.999, 1.001), P = 0.659 |
Quality appraised by Moores et al. 2022 using OHAT: Tier 2, Probably high RoB |
Ecological studies | ||||
Olczak-Kowalczyk et al. (2016) [115] Poland |
Ecological study To assess the relationship between dental caries incidence and general consumption of sucrose in 12-year-old children |
Children aged 12 (no further description) Sucrose intake per capita |
An increase in sucrose intake by 1 kg/year resulted in an increase in caries frequency by almost 0.92% and an increase in DMFT value by over 0.2% | Quality appraised by Moores et al. [4] using OHAT: Tier 2, Probably high RoB |
CI Confidence interval, D3MDT Decayed (into dentine) missing and filled permanent teeth, DMFS Decayed missing and filled permanent tooth surfaces, EI Energy intake, ICDAS International Caries Detection and Assessment System, OR Odds ratio, RoB Risk of Bias. OHAT https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/whatwestudy/assessments/noncancer/riskbias/index.html, OR odds ratio
a Original studies identified in systematic reviews addressing Question 3