Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 3;12(9):10254–10266. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5753

TABLE 3.

Response rates (ITT/randomized population).

Isa (n = 34) Isa + CemiQ2W (n = 36) Isa + CemiQ4W (n = 36)
Best overall response, n (%)
Stringent complete response 0 0 0
Complete response 0 0 0
Very good partial response 2 (5.9) 3 (8.3) 2 (5.6)
Partial response 2 (5.9) 6 (16.7) 6 (16.7)
Minimal response 4 (11.8) 4 (11.1) 6 (16.7)
Stable disease 14 (41.2) 12 (33.3) 16 (44.4)
Progressive disease 7 (20.6) 6 (16.7) 4 (11.1)
Unconfirmed progressive disease 1 (2.9) 2 (5.6) 1 (2.8)
Not evaluable/Not assessed 4 (11.8) 3 (8.3) 1 (2.8)
Overall response
Responders (sCR, CR, VGPR, or PR) 4 (11.8) 9 (25.0) 8 (22.2)
95% CI a 3.30–27.45 12.12–42.20 10.12–39.15
Fisher's exact test p value b
Isa + CemiQ2W vs Isa 0.1321
Isa + CemiQ4W vs Isa 0.2003
Clinical benefit
Responders (MR or better) 8 (23.5) 13 (36.1) 14 (38.9)
95% CI a 10.75–41.17 20.82–53.78 23.14–56.54

Abbreviations: Cemi, cemiplimab; CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; Isa, isatuximab; ITT, intent‐to‐treat; MR, minimal response; PR, partial response; Q2W, every 2 weeks; Q4W, every 4 weeks; sCR, stringent complete response; VGPR, very good partial response.

a

Estimated using Clopper–Pearson method.

b

One‐sided significance level of 0.1.