Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 13;7(1):e104. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.521

Table 1.

Conditions for trial informativeness [4952] with Rockefeller additions of “Return of Research Results,” “Data Sharing,” and “Representative Enrollment” (column 1), Rockefeller University Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS) Departments and cores (column 2) processes to support attaining the goals (column 3), metrics for assessing the outcomes (column 4) and selected performance indicators (column 5)

Conditions for trial informativeness Departments and cores Processes Metrics Performance
1. Importance: Trial hypothesis is likely to inform an important scientific, medical, or policy decision [5358]
  • Research Facilitation Office

  • Biostatistics design consultation

  • Community engagement

  • TRN

  • Required Public Health Impact Statement

  • Epidemiology course

  • ACCTS review

  • CAB review

  • TRN
    • Time in TRN until submission
    • Number of protocols terminated in TRN
    • Time from IRB submission to approval
  • ACCTS
    • Percent fully approved
    • Percent approved with stipulations
    • Number of stipulations
    • Percent tabled
  • IRB
    • Time to approval
    • Percent approved in < 30 days
  • TRN (2022)
    • Median 16 days (mean 48 days)
    • TRN terminated 6 protocols*
    • Median 5 days (Mean 26 days)
  • ACCTS (2018–2022)
    • 75% fully approved
    • 20% approved with stipulations
    • Median: 3
    • 4% tabled
  • IRB (2018–2022)
    • All protocols: mean 20 days and 80% <30 days
    • Full review, mean 32 days and 67% <30 days
2. Design: Trial methods are likely to provide meaningful evidence related to study hypothesis [5963]
  • Biostatistics

  • Rockefeller Scientific Resource Centers

  • TSE experts relevant to specific design

  • TRN

  • R3 lectures and resources

  • ACCTS Review

3. Feasibility: The trial is likely to be feasible [6467]
  • Research Facilitation Office

  • Community engagement

  • Comprehensive Recruitment consultation and ongoing support

  • TRN

  • ACCTS Review

  • CAB review

4. Integrity: Trial is conducted and analyzed in a scientifically valid manner that is faithful to design [68,69]
  • Research Nursing

  • Research Pharmacy

  • Hospitalist

  • Research coordinators

  • Research Bionutrition

  • Biostatistics/Bioinformatics

  • IT oversight of data security and management

  • Database management

  • Clinical Research Support Office

  • Research Facilitation Office

  • Research Participant Advocate

  • Good Clinical Practices Workgroup

  • Accrual Index

  • CCTS early audit program

  • Internal monitoring

  • Real-time sharing of reported protocol deviations to TSEs

  • IRB Continuing Review

  • ACCTS Continuing Review

5. Reporting: Systems are in place to ensure timely, complete and accurate reporting [70,71]
  • Clinical Research Support Office

  • Biostatistics

  • Bioinformatics

  • Regulatory support for ClinicalTrials.gov reporting

  • IT Database management and data queries

  • DSMP review

Number of Problem Records on ClinicalTrials.gov register 0 records with problem status in 2023
6. Return of Results (RoR): Investigators are counseled on appropriate return of aggregate and individual results, including actionable genetic information
  • Clinical Research Support Office

  • Research Facilitation Office

  • IRB application requires plan for return of results

  • ICF includes return of results

  • CRSO templates and assistance

  • RU Informed Consent Materials for DNA sequencing research studies

  • RoR plan part of IRB review

  • RoR in ICF part of IRB review

  • Required for IRB approval

  • Required for IRB approval

7. Data Sharing
  • Biostatistics

  • Bioinformatics

  • IT

  • Scientific Resources Center support

  • TRN – plan for good data management and reporting

  • R3 lectures and resources

  • ACCTS review

  • Study design, analysis plan required element of TRN

  • Required for ACCTS approval

8. Representative Enrollment
  • Clinical Research Support Office

  • Research Facilitation Office

  • Partnerships with Community-Based Organizations and Patient Advocacy Groups

  • TRN

  • Recruitment consultation and support

  • IRB review

  • ACCTS review

  • Recruitment
    • Number of consults
    • Percent of protocols with substantive recruitment stipulations
    • Representative enrollment
  • Recruitment
    • Consults part of TRN
    • Tracking just begun
    • For representative enrollment data, see Table 4.

ACCTS, advisory committee for clinical and translational science; IRB, institutional review board; TSE, translational science expert/educator; CAB, community advisory board; DSMB, data safety and monitoring board; IT, information technology; TRN, translational research navigation program; R3, research rigor, reproducibility, and reporting program; DSMP, data safety moniroting plan; ICF, informed consent form; CRSO, clinical research support office; RU, Rockefeller University