Skip to main content
. 2023 May 29:1–42. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1007/s10115-023-01902-w

Table 2.

significant DL models comparison on standard dataset

Year DL models applied Datasets Performance
2016 RNN [61] Twitter, Sina Weibo Accuracy-91.0% (Twitter) Accuracy-88.1% (Weibo)
2018 RNN [15] Twitter, Weibo Precision-74.02% (Twitter), 71.7% (Weibo), Recall-68.75% (Twitter), 70.34% (Weibo)
2019 BiLSTM, CNN[6] PHEME Accuracy-86.1%
2019 LSTM, CNN[57] Sina Weibo Accuracy–94% precision-93% recall-95% F1-94%
2019 GCN [33] Twitter 15, Twitter 16 Accuracy77.3% (Twitter 15) Accuracy-75.2% (Twitter 16)
2019 RNN [54] RumorEval, PHEME Accuracy-63.8% (RumorEval) Accuracy-48.3% (PHEME)
2020 BiLSTM [86] PHEME Accuracy-92.6%(PHEME 2017) Accuracy-91.9% (PHEME2018)
2020 GCN [11] Sina Weibo, Twitter 15, Twitter 16 Accuracy-96.1% (Sina Weibo) Accuracy-88.6% (Twitter 15) Accuracy-88.0% (Twitter 16)
2020 CNN [27] YELP-2, FBN Accuracy-87.2% precision-79.1% recall-84.7% F1-82%
2020 Deep learning [48] PHEME Accuracy-94.9% precision-37.4% recall-51.8% F1-79%
2020 Deep learning, CNN [5] PHEME Accuracy–94%
2021 Deep learning, LSTM [94] PHEME Accuracy–81% precision-79% recall-79% F1-81%
2021 GCN [93] Twitter 15, Twitter 16 Accuracy-87.8% (Twitter 16) Accuracy-85.6% (Twitter 15)
2021 Propagation structure, CNN [90] Twitter 15, Twitter 16, Weibo Accuracy-95.1% precision-94.5% recall-95.6% F1-95.0%
2021 GCN, [97] PHEME, Twitter 15, Twitter 16 Accuracy–89% (Twitter 15) Accuracy-91.5% (Twitter 16) Accuracy-69% (PHEME)
2021 GCN [9] PHEME Accuracy-84.1% Precision-88.2% Recall-95.6% F1- 89.6%
2021 Naive Bayes classifier [50] PHEME Accuracy-76.7%, precision-76.1% recall-76.3%
2021 Deep neural networks [8] DAT@Z20, Fake News Net Accuracy-94% precision-93% recall-95%
2021 CNN, LSTM [4] ArCOV-19 Accuracy–85% precision-85% recall-85% F1-85%
2022 GCN [106] Twitter 15, Twitter 16 Accuracy-86.5% (Twitter 16) Accuracy-83.6% (Twitter 15)
2022 BiLSTM [14] Weibo Accuracy-95% precision-94.3% recall-94.1%