Skip to main content
. 2023 May 15;14:1196319. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1196319

Table 2.

Effects of salt stress on the osmotic substances in the rapeseed seedlings under different N levels.

Salt N rate (g kg−1) Soluble protein (mg g−1 FW) Soluble sugar (mg g−1 FW) Proline (ng g−1 FW)
S0 N0 5.37 ± 0.20f 96.33 ± 2.97d 182.26 ± 5.46f
N1 5.42 ± 0.14f 96.67 ± 2.25d 196.42 ± 8.37e
N2 7.54 ± 0.12e 104.50 ± 2.69b 232.14 ± 6.71d
N3 7.80 ± 0.15d 100.57 ± 3.02c 258.48 ± 5.37c
S1 N0 7.82 ± 0.08d 96.64 ± 2.38d 252.28 ± 6.13c
N1 8.12 ± 0.18c 102.12 ± 3.06bc 270.18 ± 8.19b
N2 8.80 ± 0.17a 117.22 ± 3.25a 312.99 ± 7.51a
N3 8.55 ± 0.23b 114.64 ± 2.77a 308.62 ± 6.78a
ANOVA
salt ** ** **
N ** ** **
Salt x N ** ** **

Data are mean ± SE (n = 6). S0 and S1 respectively represent salinity levels of 0 and 3 g NaCl kg−1 soil. N0, N1, N2, and N3 respectively represent N rate levels of 0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 g N kg−1 soil. Different letters within a column indicate significant differences at p = 0.05. Probability level is indicated by ** for 0.01.

FW, fresh weight.