Tailored approaches for different settings |
Consider pretest probability of sepsis, available resources, and prevalence of other diseases with “sepsis-like” presentations |
Sepsis bundle components individualized for specific settings |
Impact of individual components on improving outcomes should be evaluated |
Develop minimum variable datasets using routinely collected data |
Minimum variable datasets and a common dictionary for data labeling can allow the merging of data for collaborative development and assessment of data-driven criteria and patient-relevant outcomes |
Develop datasets from multiple settings around the world |
The datasets should include information on patients through the continuum of care (primary care, emergency department, ward, and PICU). Ideally, the datasets should originate from diverse settings (geographical, sociodemographic, resource availability, etc.) |
Determine locally relevant time zero |
Depending on setting, the first presentations of sepsis may be to local health center, primary or secondary care |
Determine locally relevant clinical decision support systems |
Clinical decision support systems can be incorporated into electronic patient records in the high-income country and upper middle-income country settings, and mobile phone apps in low middle-income countries |
Address antimicrobial stewardship |
Structured clinical assessments and investigations can help determine treatment urgency of antimicrobials, to balance patient safety and antimicrobial stewardship |
Develop locally relevant outcome measures |
Outcome measures may include mortality, disability, critical care admission, or organ dysfunction depending on setting |
Develop affordable and accurate diagnostics |
Affordable host response and/or pathogen diagnostics can support risk stratification and stratification of likely response to novel therapies |