Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 7;12(8):e027819. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027819

Table 3.

Univariate and Multivariable Analysis of Quality of Life Scores and Primary End Point

Univariate analysis P value Multivariable analysis P value
HR (95% CI) Adjusted HR (95% CI)
SF‐36
Physical 0.98 (0.97–0.99) 0.008 1.00 (0.98–1.01) 0.715
RLPH 0.98 (0.97–0.99) 0.008 0.99 (0.97–1.00) 0.136
RLEP 1.00 (0.99–1.01) 0.445 1.00 (0.99–1.01) 0.699
Energy 0.99 (0.97–1.00) 0.139 1.00 (0.98–1.03) 0.725
Emotion 1.01 (0.99–1.03) 0.418 1.02 (1.00–1.04) 0.103
Social 1.00 (0.99–1.01) 0.876 1.01 (1.00–1.03) 0.124
Pain 0.99 (0.98–1.00) 0.156 1.00 (0.99–1.02) 0.691
General 0.97 (0.95–0.99) 0.002 0.99 (0.97–1.01) 0.195

For multivariable analysis, quality of life scores were adjusted for patient characteristics found to be significant and related to mortality (see Table 2); they were history of renal failure, history of pulmonary arterial hypertension, NYHA class III‐IV, and BNP >360 ng/L. BNP indicates brain natriuretic peptide; HR, hazard ratio; NYHA, New York Heart Association; RLEP, role limitations due to emotional problems; RLPH, role limitations due to physical health; and SF‐36, 36‐Item Short Form.